Next in thread →
Next in month →
RE: [ws-rx-editors] OO version for editors (2.0 or 1.1.5)
One thing I noticed in just doing the diff using 1.1.5 is
that it didn't automatically notice some of the grammatical problems and
spelling errors I fixed this weekend. 2.0 did, however, which could be
very useful for us in producing better docs from a purely editorial perspective.
-Steve
From: Doug Davis [mailto:]
Sent: Tuesday, Dec 13, 2005 22:07 PM
To: Winkler,
Steve
Cc:
Subject: Re:
[ws-rx-editors] OO version for editors (2.0 or 1.1.5)
I use 1.1.5. Upgrading to MS
Word work for me :-) or, I guess 2.0 of OO - don't really care as
long as we're all on the same version of something and it works.
-Doug
"Winkler, Steve"
<>
12/13/2005 02:40 PM
To
<>
cc
Subject
[ws-rx-editors] OO
version for editors (2.0 or 1.1.5)
Hi editors,
I made a detailed pass over the document this weekend
to fix up editorial issues. I tried to limit myself explicitly to issues I
deemed editorial, and will send around a red line doc showing the diffs so that
the editors can agree to the changes before I submit them.
The point of this mail is that when I tried to do the
diff to send it out right now, I was unable to do so effectively because I
apparently have a newer version of Open Office installed than the rest of you.
OO 2.0 [1] was released in October, and I was curious what the editors thought
about upgrading to the newly released version.
In the meantime, I'm currently installing the 1.1.5
version that Gil mentioned he is using so that I can produce the aforementioned
diff.
This is just a general pulse check: What versions are
editors using now, and what do the editors think about upgrading to the 2.0
version of Open Office?
Cheers,
Steve
[1] http://www.openoffice.org/press/2.0/press_release.html
Next in thread →
Next in month →