Steve,
I manually added your changes
to WD08 I just checked in. In the security section it appears you
added spaces after periods but OO's diff flagged the entire paragraph as
being changed (see why I don't trust it :-). Please verify
that I didn't mess up.
I didn't do anything with the issues
you mentioned in the text of your note below - except I did add RMD to
the glossary since I had an AI for that.
-Doug
"Winkler, Steve"
<>
12/14/2005 01:06 AM
To
<>
cc
Subject
[ws-rx-editors] Editorial
changes (I swear!)
Hi Editors,
I went over the core spec in detail this weekend
and found several changes that I would assert are purely editorial. I
produced a cleaned up version, but would like to verify that you all agree
that these changes are editorial before I submit them. It will also
be helpful for me to have you review the proposed changes as this is my
first attempt at using OO for editorial purposes and I want to make sure
it looks right before I upload it. Attached is a red line diff between
the new version of the spec.
Additionally, I noticed a few more substantial
editorial issues that I think we'll either need to discuss or raise to
the TC. I'll bring these up in a separate mail, but for example:
- RM Destination is defined in the glossary,
but RM Source is not.
- Element definitions alternate between using RFC 2119 and not. E.g "This
REQUIRED element blah blah blah" followed by "This element, if
present, blah blah blah" instead of "This OPTIONAL element blah
blah blah"
- "piggy backing" is mentioned several
times, but defined no where.
Etc. etc.
Cheers,
Steve
<<wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-07-steve-diff.pdf>>
[attachment "wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-07-steve-diff.pdf" deleted by Doug
Davis/Raleigh/IBM]
