That sounds ok to me.
-Anish
--
Patil, Sanjay wrote:
>>Does anybody feel that we should name the files something
>>along the lines:
>>wsrm-1.1-wsdl-200510-wdXX.xsd.
>
>
> As per the resolution of issue i074 [1], the TC accepted to name the
> final wsdl and xsd files as wsrm-1.1.wsdl and wsrm-1.1.xsd respectively.
> I understand that this is not helpful for naming the wsdl and xsd files
> for WDs and CDs. How about including the <status>-<revision> just before
> the file extension? For example, the CD II wsdl file would be named -
> wsrm-1.1-cd-02.wsdl
>
>
> [1]
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssues.xml#i074
