Sounds like another note for your process document, Gil.
+1 to use the latest version and please DO document this.
--umit
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gilbert Pilz [mailto:]
> Sent: Tuesday, Jan 17, 2006 12:09 PM
> To: Patil, Sanjay; Anish Karmarkar
> Cc: Doug Davis;
> Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] tabs in xml
>
> Splitting out the schema and wsdl files caused a problem that
> we should
> have forseen; since the files are now separate artifacts they
> can change
> independently of one another. For example, suppose we had
> wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-10.odt that included
> wsrm-1.1-wsdl-200510-wd-10.wsdl to
> make wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-10.pdf. Now we make some changes to
> wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-11.odt and are preparing to publish it as
> wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-11.pdf. The WSDL file hasn't changed so do we include
> wsrm-1.1-wsdl-200510-wd-10.wsdl or do we create a
> wsrm-1.1-wsdl-200510-11.wsdl (which is exactly the same as
> the previous
> version) or what? It seems counter-intuitive to me to create a new
> version of an artifact that is exactly the same as the
> previous version
> solely for the purpose of trackig another artifact.
>
> I was thinking that, since schema and WSDL file changes are rare, we
> should just let Kavi take care of all the versions of
> wsrm*-1.1-*-200510.* and always include "the latest version" when we
> generate PDF's for public consumption.
>
> - g
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Patil, Sanjay [mailto:]
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 11:14 AM
> > To: Anish Karmarkar; Gilbert Pilz
> > Cc: Doug Davis;
> > Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] tabs in xml
> >
> > > Does anybody feel that we should name the files something
> along the
> > > lines:
> > > wsrm-1.1-wsdl-200510-wdXX.xsd.
> >
> > As per the resolution of issue i074 [1], the TC accepted to
> > name the final wsdl and xsd files as wsrm-1.1.wsdl and
> > wsrm-1.1.xsd respectively.
> > I understand that this is not helpful for naming the wsdl and
> > xsd files for WDs and CDs. How about including the
> > <status>-<revision> just before the file extension? For
> > example, the CD II wsdl file would be named - wsrm-1.1-cd-02.wsdl
> >
> >
> > [1]
> > http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssue
> > s.xml#i074
> >
>
