Sanjay,
Gil has already sent a document to the list illustrating this and worked
on it quite a bit [1]. I reviewed it and it looks good. Isn't this what
you are asking about?
My suggestion was to put the item about managing schema files as a
concrete addition to that document. I have not got around to adding
couple of statements about the revision numbers and managing Kavi.
I suggest we put Gil's document into the document repository. As we need
to add new procedures/new items update it as necessary to refine it.
Does that sound reasonable?
--umit
[1]
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/email/archives/200601
/msg00076.html
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Patil, Sanjay
> Sent: Tuesday, Jan 17, 2006 1:46 PM
> To: Yalcinalp, Umit; 'Gilbert Pilz'; 'Anish Karmarkar'
> Cc: 'Doug Davis'; ''
> Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] tabs in xml
>
>
>
> That reminds me of a possible agenda item for this week's
> call - discuss document policy. Are the editors prepared to
> present and discuss the process/policy you are following. Who
> is planning to take the lead?
>
> Thanks,
> Sanjay
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Yalcinalp, Umit
> > Sent: Tuesday, Jan 17, 2006 13:36 PM
> > To: Gilbert Pilz; Patil, Sanjay; Anish Karmarkar
> > Cc: Doug Davis;
> > Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] tabs in xml
> >
> > Sounds like another note for your process document, Gil.
> >
> > +1 to use the latest version and please DO document this.
> >
> > --umit
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Gilbert Pilz [mailto:]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, Jan 17, 2006 12:09 PM
> > > To: Patil, Sanjay; Anish Karmarkar
> > > Cc: Doug Davis;
> > > Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] tabs in xml
> > >
> > > Splitting out the schema and wsdl files caused a problem that
> > > we should
> > > have forseen; since the files are now separate artifacts they
> > > can change
> > > independently of one another. For example, suppose we had
> > > wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-10.odt that included
> > > wsrm-1.1-wsdl-200510-wd-10.wsdl to
> > > make wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-10.pdf. Now we make some changes to
> > > wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-11.odt and are preparing to publish it as
> > > wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-11.pdf. The WSDL file hasn't changed so do
> > we include
> > > wsrm-1.1-wsdl-200510-wd-10.wsdl or do we create a
> > > wsrm-1.1-wsdl-200510-11.wsdl (which is exactly the same as
> > > the previous
> > > version) or what? It seems counter-intuitive to me to create a new
> > > version of an artifact that is exactly the same as the
> > > previous version
> > > solely for the purpose of trackig another artifact.
> > >
> > > I was thinking that, since schema and WSDL file changes
> are rare, we
> > > should just let Kavi take care of all the versions of
> > > wsrm*-1.1-*-200510.* and always include "the latest
> version" when we
> > > generate PDF's for public consumption.
> > >
> > > - g
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Patil, Sanjay [mailto:]
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 11:14 AM
> > > > To: Anish Karmarkar; Gilbert Pilz
> > > > Cc: Doug Davis;
> > > > Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] tabs in xml
> > > >
> > > > > Does anybody feel that we should name the files something
> > > along the
> > > > > lines:
> > > > > wsrm-1.1-wsdl-200510-wdXX.xsd.
> > > >
> > > > As per the resolution of issue i074 [1], the TC accepted to
> > > > name the final wsdl and xsd files as wsrm-1.1.wsdl and
> > > > wsrm-1.1.xsd respectively.
> > > > I understand that this is not helpful for naming the wsdl and
> > > > xsd files for WDs and CDs. How about including the
> > > > <status>-<revision> just before the file extension? For
> > > > example, the CD II wsdl file would be named -
> wsrm-1.1-cd-02.wsdl
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > > > http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssue
> > > > s.xml#i074
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
