It turns out that the minutes
(http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/download.php/16391/MinutesWS-RX-1-19-2006.doc)
were less than helpful. They record that the TC "accepts the proposal as the
namespace URI v ersioning policy" but don't say whether this policy should be
included in any documents.
The RDDL documents already
contain the text of the policy. I think this is a good place for this text
because these documents are supposed to describe the namespace and one of the
important things you may want to know about a namespace it what its life-cycle
looks like.
I'm going to do the
following:
1.) check in the RDDL docs to
the WS-RX editors page
2.) make sure the RDDL docs are
in synch with the resolution to i088
3.) create links from WS-RM and
WS-RM Policy to the RDDL doce (really just links to the
namespace
Let me know how this
sounds.
- gp
From: Doug Davis [mailto:]
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 11:31 AM
To: Gilbert
Pilz
Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] pending
issues
Seems odd to me since the reader
of the doc can't really do anything with that info - its up to the spec
authors to decide when to change the namespace and the reader has no control
over it.
-Doug
"Gilbert Pilz"
<>
02/15/2006 02:27 PM
To
Doug
Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS,
<>
cc
Subject
RE: [ws-rx-editors]
pending issues
My memory of the discussion
around i088 is that the policy statement should appear somewhere in the text
of both documents. I'll look through the minutes and see if I can piece
anything together . . .
From: Doug Davis [mailto:]
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 7:24 AM
To:
Subject: [ws-rx-editors] pending
issues
All,
From looking thru the list of pending issues the only ones
left to complete are:
58 - I've asked Bob for the latest version of the state tables so
we can add them
88
- Is there really something that needs to go into the spec for this?
Looks more like 'guidance' than actual spec changes
93 - Haven't had time yet
Does anyone else have the
time to look at 93 and 58 (once Bob sends the state table)?
On the positive side none of
these really impact the specs very much (at least in terms of the xml) - worst
is a namespace change.
thanks
-Doug
