You don't think blah blah blah covers
it?? :-)
Nope - its not done - I had enough time
to manually add the state tables themselves just a Bob had them - no updates
since they were originally posted and left all of the ?'s in there too.
So the blah blah blah's need to be replaced with more meaningful
text - just ran out of time.
thanks,
-Doug
Anish Karmarkar <>
02/17/2006 05:11 PM
To
Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
cc
Subject
Re: [ws-rx-editors] pending
issues
Doug Davis wrote:
>
> All,
> From looking thru the list of pending issues the only ones
left to
> complete are:
> 58 - I've asked Bob for the latest version of the state tables so
we can
> add them
> 88 - Is there really something that needs to go into the spec for
this?
> Looks more like 'guidance' than actual spec changes
> 93 - Haven't had time yet
>
> Does anyone else have the time to look at 93 and 58 (once Bob sends
the
> state table)?
Did Bob send the state table?
I see that the table has been added (and your 'checkin' comments say --
1st pass at adding a state table), but there are a few 'blah blah blah'
comments. So I'm not sure how complete it is. Basically I'm trying to
determine if 58 is done?
Thx.
-Anish
--
> On the positive side none of these really impact the specs very much
(at
> least in terms of the xml) - worst is a namespace change.
>
> thanks
> -Doug
