Also, it isn’t our
fault (that I can tell) but it sure would be nice if the CD2 could get posted
before we get to CD3. How long have we been waiting on an answer now on that? Are
we going to get to PR before any of our approved CDs get posted? Honestly I’ve
been sitting on a bunch of the “done” issues that need to be
changed to “closed” so that I can add a remark pointing to the CD2
doc that closes them. This is really starting to hurt.
Sanjay or Paul, have
you guys heard anything yet?
Marc Goodner
Technical Diplomat
Microsoft Corporation
Tel: (425) 703-1903
Blog: http://spaces.msn.com/mrgoodner/
From: Marc Goodner
[mailto:]
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006
1:32 PM
To: Doug Davis;
Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] next
CD?
I have plans to
review today, at least as a first pass. I expect I’ll get though a deeper
review at the latest tomorrow afternoon.
Was a CD3 candidate
asked for by the TC? Seems premature if not, I suggest bringing this up on
Thursday’s call and being ready to post it afterwards. Not that I’m
opposed, I’m actually inclined to think we should do a CD before the F2F.
Marc Goodner
Technical Diplomat
Microsoft Corporation
Tel: (425) 703-1903
Blog: http://spaces.msn.com/mrgoodner/
From: Doug Davis
[mailto:]
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006
1:13 PM
To:
Subject: [ws-rx-editors] next CD?
All,
I just did a quick scan of the diffs between the last CD and the WDs we have
available. I found two minor typos in the core spec but nothing serious
enough to regen everything. Has anyone else looked at 'em (aside from
Anish) - I'd like to post 'em to the TC today as candidate CD 3.
thanks
-Doug
