I looked through the minutes and didn't see any record of it. I thought
I remembered that to but two RX meetings per day breaks my brain on
where what was said.
I can't wait until we stop that BTW, 2.5 hours per week (just on calls
mind you, and all on the same day) for a TC with just 5 open issues is
just madness. Madness I tell you!
Marc Goodner
Technical Diplomat
Microsoft Corporation
Tel: (425) 703-1903
Blog: http://spaces.msn.com/mrgoodner/
-----Original Message-----
From: Anish Karmarkar [mailto:]
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 3:45 PM
To: Marc Goodner
Cc: Doug Davis;
Subject: Re: [ws-rx-editors] next CD?
Marc Goodner wrote:
> I have plans to review today, at least as a first pass. I expect I'll
> get though a deeper review at the latest tomorrow afternoon.
>
>
>
> Was a CD3 candidate asked for by the TC? Seems premature if not, I
> suggest bringing this up on Thursday's call and being ready to post it
> afterwards. Not that I'm opposed, I'm actually inclined to think we
> should do a CD before the F2F.
>
I could be wrong but I thought the TC decided that there was going to be
CD 3 before the F2F.
(haven't trolled thru the minutes to figure this out)
-Anish
--
>
>
> Marc Goodner
>
> Technical Diplomat
>
> Microsoft Corporation
>
> Tel: (425) 703-1903
>
> Blog: http://spaces.msn.com/mrgoodner/
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *From:* Doug Davis [mailto:]
> *Sent:* Monday, February 20, 2006 1:13 PM
> *To:*
> *Subject:* [ws-rx-editors] next CD?
>
>
>
>
> All,
> I just did a quick scan of the diffs between the last CD and the WDs
> we have available. I found two minor typos in the core spec but
nothing
> serious enough to regen everything. Has anyone else looked at 'em
> (aside from Anish) - I'd like to post 'em to the TC today as candidate
> CD 3.
> thanks
> -Doug
>
