Pl see agenda item 4.2 for discussion of CD 3 in the
minutes of the 2/9 main TC conf-call at:
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/16663/MinutesWSRX-020906.htm
-- Sanjay
From: Marc Goodner
[mailto:]
Sent: Monday, Feb 20, 2006 18:00
PM
To: Doug Davis;
Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] next
CD?
All I’m saying is
the record doesn’t reflect that. It may have been said, I don’t recall and it
isn’t recorded. I’m not opposed to moving quickly to get to CD3. Something
tells me these last issues are going to take a little while (regret filing
i061 yet Doug? ;-)) and are unlikely to close in time to make it into any CD
before the F2F. So I’m fine with moving quickly if we
can.
And yes I’ve been
to busy to review the docs before 5 today… I’ll do my best to get comments in
ASAP but I’m not going to ask anyone to hold up anything on my
account.
Marc
Goodner
Technical
Diplomat
Microsoft
Corporation
Tel: (425)
703-1903
Blog: http://spaces.msn.com/mrgoodner/
From: Doug
Davis [mailto:]
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 5:41
PM
To:
Subject: Re: [ws-rx-editors] next
CD?
I thought this
was gonna be CD3 - but maybe that was just wishful thinking - I really thought
Paul had said we should make it available by last Friday so people could
review it ASAP as cd3 - oh well, guess we're not in that big of a
rush.
-Doug
Anish
Karmarkar <>
02/20/2006 08:35
PM
To
Marc Goodner
<>
cc
Doug
Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS,
Subject
Re:
[ws-rx-editors] next
CD?
Marc Goodner
wrote:
> I looked through the minutes and didn't see any record
of it. I thought
> I remembered
that to but two RX meetings per day breaks my brain
on
> where what was
said.
>
I was basing that on email
exchanges that I had with Dug last week.
Ok, so we should not consider this to be a candidate for
CD3 (at least
not till the TC
agrees).
> I can't wait
until we stop that BTW, 2.5 hours per week (just on
calls
> mind you, and all on
the same day) for a TC with just 5 open issues is
> just madness. Madness I tell
you!
>
I empathize with
you.
Although, I don't attend both
the WSRX calls, I still sometimes can't
keep things straight in my brain about what happened in
which TC/WG.
Kudos to Tom for
taking great minutes (and volunteering for it!!).
-Anish
--
>
Marc Goodner
> Technical
Diplomat
> Microsoft
Corporation
> Tel: (425)
703-1903
> Blog:
http://spaces.msn.com/mrgoodner/
>
>
> -----Original
Message-----
> From: Anish
Karmarkar [mailto:]
> Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 3:45
PM
> To: Marc
Goodner
> Cc: Doug Davis;
> Subject: Re: [ws-rx-editors] next
CD?
>
> Marc Goodner wrote:
>
>>I
have plans to review today, at least as a first pass. I expect I'll
>>get though a deeper
review at the latest tomorrow afternoon.
>>
>>
>>
>>Was a CD3 candidate asked for by the TC? Seems
premature if not, I
>>suggest bringing this up on Thursday's call and
being ready to post it
>
>
>>afterwards. Not that I'm opposed, I'm actually
inclined to think we
>>should do a CD before the
F2F.
>>
>
>
> I could be wrong but I thought the TC decided that
there was going to be
>
> CD 3 before the
F2F.
> (haven't trolled thru
the minutes to figure this out)
>
>
-Anish
>
--
>
>
>>
>>
>>Marc Goodner
>>
>>Technical Diplomat
>>
>>Microsoft Corporation
>>
>>Tel: (425) 703-1903
>>
>>Blog:
http://spaces.msn.com/mrgoodner/
>>
>>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>>*From:* Doug Davis
[mailto:]
>>*Sent:* Monday, February 20, 2006 1:13
PM
>>*To:*
>>*Subject:* [ws-rx-editors] next
CD?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>All,
>> I just did a quick scan of the diffs between
the last CD and the WDs
>
>
>>we have available. I found two minor typos in
the core spec but
>
> nothing
>
>>serious enough to regen everything. Has
anyone else looked at 'em
>>(aside from Anish) - I'd like to post 'em to the TC
today as candidate
>
>
>>CD 3.
>>thanks
>>-Doug
>>
