You must be bored today ;-)
I'd prefer to leave it as 200602 - less
change of a mess-up, nothing as changed this month, and as you said leave
it open to use 200603 if we need it.
-Doug
"Marc Goodner"
<>
03/01/2006 03:03 PM
To
<>
cc
Subject
[ws-rx-editors] Am I going
to be this terrible?
Yes.
Assuming the CD passes, should the namespace
be updated to 200603 rather than 200602?
Before you throw anything at me I’m not
sure it should be. Particularly if we put together a new CD to go to PR
before the end of this month. I’m not sure that’s feasible, but if it
is we might want to still have the availability of the 200603 dated namespace.
Marc Goodner
Technical Diplomat
Microsoft Corporation
Tel: (425) 703-1903
Blog: http://spaces.msn.com/mrgoodner/
