WD editorial comments/questions

I’m still need to do a second pass, but here are the results
from my first pass. Page numbers are from the pdfs without diff lines.

 

All three specs

·        
Footers need the dates updated. I recommend
scanning throughout for 2006 to update to 2007 (copyright, etc.)

·        
Link issues from RM PDF, I stopped checking
further after I discovered that these don’t seem to be issues in the
generated html. Is there a known issue with the tool you are using to generate
the pdf? I noticed similar issues in the other specs. Even in the html the
links to internal document bookmarks, e.g. section headings or references are
often either broken or not active.

o  
Spec location link is not active

o  
Anish’s email is not hyperlinked in the editor
list, the others are

o  
None of the references in the abstract and the
other sections are links though they look like links

o  
In status section the IPR link is not active, 2nd
link to TC page is not active

o  
TOC, Section heading links are broken, Appendix
entries are not links

 

RM

·        
Page 8, section 2.3 “in stead”
should be “instead”

·        
Page 23, section 3.9, under Nack definition, the
second to last sentence “within a AcknowledgementRange” should be “within
an AcknowledgementRange”

·        
Page 25, section 4, should WSRM Required be
WSRMRequired? The section heading for that fault has the space so its probably
correct as it is.

·        
Page 29, section4.7 “can not” should
be “cannot”

 

RM Policy

·        
No other issues.

 

MakeConnection

·        
Page 10, section 3.2 2nd to last
bullet “E.g. In” should be “E.g. in”

 

 

Questions

The schema/wsdl has changed. Are the separate files ready?

Have the XML examples in the specs been checked to make sure
they are valid?