Mary
Our editors have had a look at the new template and they are concerned
that switching to the new template will affect the PR timing and our vote.
They have suggested the following approach:
* The main difference between the new template and the old is the IPR text.
* Therefore we add the IPR text to the current document for PR
* During PR the editors switch to the new template and work on the HTML
output
* In addition they fix up the RDDL document during that period
I think this addresses the problems for PR. Firstly, as long as the PR
doc has the right IPR text the formatting shouldn't be an issue.
Secondly, as I understand it the RDDL isn't a necessary piece of the PR.
I have asked the editors to produce you the docs with the updated IPR text.
Please let me know if this is acceptable.
Paul
Mary McRae wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> I'm afraid that there's some work to be done on the package before it can be sent out for public review. Since the
> documents will need to be changed, I'm going to ask you to switch to the new templates as well, which satisfy the Naming
> Guidelines and Metadata policy that was adopted last fall.
>
> The template home page is here: http://docs.oasis-open.org/templates/
> and you should be using the template for the 4-15-2005 IPR notices:
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/templates/OASISSpecificationTemplateV3.0.dot (Word) or
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/templates/OASISSpecificationTemplateV3.0.ott (OO)
>
> The user guide (http://docs.oasis-open.org/templates/OASIS_Specification_Template_Guidelines.html) hopefully does a good
> job of explaining what information goes where as well as links to the specific sections of the policy documents.
>
> Robin and I are also discussing how to handle the new/old namespace - including noting the previous namespace in the
> current RDDL and potentially making some note in the older one (200608). As I'm just reviewing this on Sat AM, I don't
> anticipate being able to resolve those questions until early next week but will get back to the TC as soon as possible.
>
> ----
>
> WS-Reliable Messaging (wsrm)
> Specification:
> In general:
> Update cover page, Status and Notice section to correspond to the templates noted above. This includes moving the Notice
> section from the rear of the document to the front.
>
> 1. The schema does not need to contain the entire notice; it is acceptable for it to contain only the Copyright slug
> line. However, the notice included is for Legacy IPR TCs rather than that contained in the 4-15-05 IPR Policy.
> 2. The wsdl does not need to contain the entire notice; it is acceptable for it to contain only the Copyright slug line.
> However, the notice included is for Legacy IPR TCs rather than that contained in the 4-15-05 IPR Policy.
> 3. Acknowledgements:
> Christopher Ferris-Editor(BM) -- (should be IBM?)
>
> DIFF (PDF file)
> There are two diff files in the zip; I need a single diff file that compares the version previously submitted for PR
> (200608) with the current document.
>
> RDDL
> *NOTE There should be some mention of the previous namespace; there is also discussion underway about what information
> should be placed at the previous (200608) namespace indicating that it's been superceded.
>
> Schema
> The schema does not need to contain the entire notice; it is acceptable for it to contain only the Copyright slug line.
> However, the notice included is for Legacy IPR TCs rather than that contained in the 4-15-05 IPR Policy.
>
> WSDL
> The wsdl does not need to contain the entire notice; it is acceptable for it to contain only the Copyright slug line.
> However, the notice included is for Legacy IPR TCs rather than that contained in the 4-15-05 IPR Policy.
>
>
> ----
>
>
> WS-MakeConnection (wsmc)
> Specification:
> In general:
> Update cover page, Status and Notice section to correspond to the templates noted above. This includes moving the Notice
> section from the rear of the document to the front.
>
> Specifics:
> 1. This is the first CD of this document and should be marked accordingly (Committee Draft 01)
> 2. Revision history must note that this document began with extracted section(s) from WSRM and identify those
> section(s). Alternatively, this is a new document and subject to a 60-day public review.
> 3. The schema does not need to contain the entire notice; it is acceptable for it to contain only the Copyright slug
> line. However, the notice included is for Legacy IPR TCs rather than that contained in the 4-15-05 IPR Policy.
>
> RDDL
> 1. This is the first CD of this document and should be marked accordingly (revision 01)
>
> Schema
> The schema does not need to contain the entire notice; it is acceptable for it to contain only the Copyright slug line.
> However, the notice included is for Legacy IPR TCs rather than that contained in the 4-15-05 IPR Policy.
>
> WSDL
> The wsdl does not need to contain the entire notice; it is acceptable for it to contain only the Copyright slug line.
> However, the notice included is for Legacy IPR TCs rather than that contained in the 4-15-05 IPR Policy.
>
> DIFF
> For some reason there's a diff file in this directory; this is the first instance of this document.
>
>
> ----
>
>
> WS-RM Policy (wsrmp)
> Specification:
> In general:
> Update cover page, Status and Notice section to correspond to the templates noted above. This includes moving the Notice
> section from the rear of the document to the front.
>
> 1.The schema does not need to contain the entire notice; it is acceptable for it to contain only the Copyright slug
> line. However, the notice included is for Legacy IPR TCs rather than that contained in the 4-15-05 IPR Policy.
>
> DIFF (PDF file)
> There are two diff files in the zip; I need a single diff file that compares the version previously submitted for PR
> (200608) with the current document.
>
> RDDL
> *NOTE There should be some mention of the previous namespace; there is also discussion underway about what information
> should be placed at the previous (200608) namespace indicating that it's been superceded.
>
> Schema
> The schema does not need to contain the entire notice; it is acceptable for it to contain only the Copyright slug line.
> However, the notice included is for Legacy IPR TCs rather than that contained in the 4-15-05 IPR Policy.
>
> ----
>
> I'll try to turn new files around as quickly as possible but can make no promises beyond the stated 5 business day SLA.
>
> Regards,
>
> Mary
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Paul Fremantle [mailto:]
>> Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 12:43 PM
>> To:
>> Cc: ; ;
>>
>> Subject: Re: [ws-rx] Groups - ws-rx_cd05.zip uploaded
>>
>> Mary
>>
>> The basic situation is that 22286 has more beautiful HTML and
>> 22268 has the images in it.
>>
>> I propose that we go with 22268 for PR (since it is more
>> accurate if less beautiful) and that in the meantime the
>> editors will prepare a beautified version of the HTML that
>> will be the basis of our CS.
>>
>> Please remember to include our HTML disclaimer!
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Paul
>>
>>
>>
>> Mary McRae wrote:
>>> So I should use this one (22286) rather than 22268?
>>>
>>> m
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: [mailto:]
>>>> Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 8:16 PM
>>>> To:
>>>> Cc:
>>>> Subject: [ws-rx] Groups - ws-rx_cd05.zip uploaded
>>>>
>>>> Replaced HTML versions with Marc Goodner's better HTML files.
>>>>
>>>> -- Gilbert Pilz
>>>>
>>>> The document revision named ws-rx_cd05.zip has been submitted by
>>>> Gilbert Pilz to the OASIS Web Services Reliable Exchange
>>>> (WS-RX) TC document repository. This document is revision #1 of
>>>> ws-rx_cd05.zip.
>>>>
>>>> Document Description:
>>>> Complete WS-RX CD05 package in proper directory structure and RDDL
>>>> files.
>>>> Replaced HTML versions with Marc Goodner's better HTML files.
>>>>
>>>> View Document Details:
>>>> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/document.ph
>>>> p?document_id=22286
>>>>
>>>> Download Document:
>>>> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/download.ph
>>>> p/22286/ws-rx_cd05.zip
>>>>
>>>> Revision:
>>>> This document is revision #1 of ws-rx_cd05.zip. The
>> document details
>>>> page referenced above will show the complete revision history.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> PLEASE NOTE: If the above links do not work for you, your email
>>>> application may be breaking the link into two pieces.
>>>> You may be able to copy and paste the entire link address into the
>>>> address field of your web browser.
>>>>
>>>> -OASIS Open Administration
>>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Paul Fremantle
>> VP/Technology and Partnerships, WSO2
>> OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
>>
>> http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle
>>
>> (646) 290 8050
>>
>> "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
>>
>
>
--
Paul Fremantle
VP/Technology and Partnerships, WSO2
OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle
(646) 290 8050
"Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
