RE: [ws-rx-editors] RE: [ws-rx] Groups - ws-rx_cd05.zip uploaded

Oh that stuff is fine as long as it's in there somewhere. 
It's just everything up to and including the Notices (pre TOC) that I'm 
concerned about. Thanks!

 

m

  

  
  From: Doug Davis [mailto:] 
  
Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2007 9:39 AM
To: 
  
Cc: ; Mary McRae; 
  'Paul Fremantle'; 
Subject: Re: 
  [ws-rx-editors] RE: [ws-rx] Groups - ws-rx_cd05.zip 
  uploaded

  

Mary, 
  updating the first couple of pages isn't that 
  bad - I've already started that.  What about the other changes?  For 
  example, section 1.1 is now "Terminology" instead of "National Conventions". 
   Or "Normative References" being at section 1.2 instead of at the end of 
  the doc (section 7 in our RM spec)?  How much like the template do we 
  need to be for this PR? 

thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM 
   |  Web Services Architect  |  IBM Software Group
(919) 
  254-6905  |  IBM T/L 444-6905  |   
  

  
    
    

      "Mary McRae" 
        <> 
Sent by: Mary McRae <> 
        
02/11/2007 07:53 AM 
        
          
          

            
              
Please respond 
              to
<>

      
        
          
          

            
              
To

            "'Paul Fremantle'" 
              <> 
          

            
              
cc

            <>, 
              <> 
          

            
              
Subject

            [ws-rx-editors] RE: [ws-rx] 
              Groups - ws-rx_cd05.zip uploaded

        
          
          

            
            

Hi Paul,

 I'm asking all TCs to switch to the new template 
  prior to Public Review. Updating the cover page is only a matter 
  of
replacing a few existing out-of-date metdata fields with one or two new 
  ones; you folks already have the URIs you need
for the cover page since 
  they're already in use, and the namespace is declared.

 Yes, the 
  RDDL is a necessary component of the PR; otherwise the documents will be 
  hidden from view.

Regards,

Mary 

> -----Original 
  Message-----
> From: Paul Fremantle [mailto:] 
> 
  Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2007 3:49 AM
> To: 
  
> Cc: ; 
  
> Subject: Re: [ws-rx] Groups - 
  ws-rx_cd05.zip uploaded
> 
> Mary
> 
> Our editors 
  have had a look at the new template and they are 
> concerned that 
  switching to the new template will affect the 
> PR timing and our 
  vote.
> 
> They have suggested the following approach:
> * 
  The main difference between the new template and the old is 
> the IPR 
  text.
> * Therefore we add the IPR text to the current document for 
  PR
> * During PR the editors switch to the new template and work 
  
> on the HTML output
> * In addition they fix up the RDDL 
  document during that period
> 
> I think this addresses the 
  problems for PR. Firstly, as long 
> as the PR doc has the right IPR 
  text the formatting shouldn't 
> be an issue.
> Secondly, as I 
  understand it the RDDL isn't a necessary piece 
> of the PR.
> 
  
> I have asked the editors to produce you the docs with the 
> 
  updated IPR text.
> 
> Please let me know if this is 
  acceptable.
> 
> Paul
> 
> Mary McRae wrote:
> 
  > Hi Paul,
> > 
> >   I'm afraid that there's some 
  work to be done on the 
> package before 
> > it can be sent 
  out for public review. Since the documents 
> will need to 
> > 
  be changed, I'm going to ask you to switch to the new 
> templates as 
  well, which satisfy the Naming Guidelines and 
> Metadata policy that 
  was adopted last fall.
> > 
> > The template home page is 
  here: 
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/templates/
> > and you 
  should be using the template for the 4-15-2005 IPR notices:
> > 
  
> 
  http://docs.oasis-open.org/templates/OASISSpecificationTemplateV3.0.do
> 
  > t (Word) or 
> > 
> 
  http://docs.oasis-open.org/templates/OASISSpecificationTemplateV3.0.ot
> 
  > t (OO)
> > 
> > The user guide 
> > 
> 
  (http://docs.oasis-open.org/templates/OASIS_Specification_Temp
> 
  late_Guidelines.html) hopefully does a good job of explaining 
> what 
  information goes where as well as links to the specific 
> sections of 
  the policy documents.
> > 
> > Robin and I are also 
  discussing how to handle the new/old 
> namespace - 
> > 
  including noting the previous namespace in the current RDDL and 
> > 
  potentially making some note in the older one (200608). As 
> I'm just 
  reviewing this on Sat AM, I don't anticipate being 
> able to resolve 
  those questions until early next week but 
> will get back to the TC as 
  soon as possible.
> > 
> > ----
> > 
> > 
  WS-Reliable Messaging (wsrm)
> > Specification:
> > In 
  general:
> > Update cover page, Status and Notice section to 
  correspond to the 
> > templates noted above. This includes moving 
  the Notice 
> section from the rear of the document to the 
  front.
> > 
> > 1. The schema does not need to contain the 
  entire notice; it is 
> > acceptable for it to contain only the 
  Copyright slug line. 
> However, the notice included is for Legacy IPR 
  TCs rather 
> than that contained in the 4-15-05 IPR Policy.
> 
  > 2. The wsdl does not need to contain the entire notice; it 
> is 
  acceptable for it to contain only the Copyright slug line.
> > 
  However, the notice included is for Legacy IPR TCs rather 
> than that 
  contained in the 4-15-05 IPR Policy.
> > 3. Acknowledgements:
> 
  > Christopher Ferris-Editor(BM) -- (should be IBM?)
> > 
> 
  > DIFF (PDF file)
> > There are two diff files in the zip; I need 
  a single diff file that 
> > compares the version previously 
  submitted for PR
> > (200608) with the current document.
> > 
  
> > RDDL
> > *NOTE There should be some mention of the 
  previous 
> namespace; there is 
> > also discussion underway 
  about what information should be 
> placed at the previous (200608) 
  namespace indicating that 
> it's been superceded.
> > 
> 
  > Schema
> > The schema does not need to contain the entire 
  notice; it 
> is acceptable for it to contain only the Copyright slug 
  line.
> > However, the notice included is for Legacy IPR TCs rather 
  
> than that contained in the 4-15-05 IPR Policy.
> > 
> 
  > WSDL
> > The wsdl does not need to contain the entire notice; it 
  is 
> acceptable for it to contain only the Copyright slug line.
> 
  > However, the notice included is for Legacy IPR TCs rather 
> than 
  that contained in the 4-15-05 IPR Policy.
> > 
> > 
> 
  > ----
> > 
> > 
> > WS-MakeConnection 
  (wsmc)
> > Specification:
> > In general:
> > 
  Update cover page, Status and Notice section to correspond to the 
> 
  > templates noted above. This includes moving the Notice 
> section 
  from the rear of the document to the front.
> > 
> > 
  Specifics:
> > 1. This is the first CD of this document and should be 
  marked 
> > accordingly (Committee Draft 01) 2. Revision history must 
  note that 
> > this document began with extracted section(s) from 
  WSRM and 
> identify those section(s). Alternatively, this is a new 
  
> document and subject to a 60-day public review.
> > 3. The 
  schema does not need to contain the entire notice; it is 
> > 
  acceptable for it to contain only the Copyright slug line. 
> However, 
  the notice included is for Legacy IPR TCs rather 
> than that contained 
  in the 4-15-05 IPR Policy.
> > 
> > RDDL
> > 1. 
  This is the first CD of this document and should be marked 
> > 
  accordingly (revision 01)
> > 
> > Schema
> > The 
  schema does not need to contain the entire notice; it 
> is acceptable 
  for it to contain only the Copyright slug line.
> > However, the 
  notice included is for Legacy IPR TCs rather 
> than that contained in 
  the 4-15-05 IPR Policy.
> > 
> > WSDL
> > The wsdl 
  does not need to contain the entire notice; it is 
> acceptable for it 
  to contain only the Copyright slug line.
> > However, the notice 
  included is for Legacy IPR TCs rather 
> than that contained in the 
  4-15-05 IPR Policy.
> > 
> > DIFF
> > For some 
  reason there's a diff file in this directory; this 
> is the first 
  instance of this document.
> > 
> > 
> > 
  ----
> > 
> > 
> > WS-RM Policy (wsrmp)
> 
  > Specification:
> > In general:
> > Update cover page, 
  Status and Notice section to correspond to the 
> > templates noted 
  above. This includes moving the Notice 
> section from the rear of the 
  document to the front.
> > 
> > 1.The schema does not need 
  to contain the entire notice; it is 
> > acceptable for it to contain 
  only the Copyright slug line. 
> However, the notice included is for 
  Legacy IPR TCs rather 
> than that contained in the 4-15-05 IPR 
  Policy.
> > 
> > DIFF (PDF file)
> > There are two 
  diff files in the zip; I need a single diff file that 
> > compares 
  the version previously submitted for PR
> > (200608) with the current 
  document.
> > 
> > RDDL
> > *NOTE There should be 
  some mention of the previous 
> namespace; there is 
> > also 
  discussion underway about what information should be 
> placed at the 
  previous (200608) namespace indicating that 
> it's been 
  superceded.
> > 
> > Schema
> > The schema does not 
  need to contain the entire notice; it 
> is acceptable for it to contain 
  only the Copyright slug line.
> > However, the notice included is for 
  Legacy IPR TCs rather 
> than that contained in the 4-15-05 IPR 
  Policy.
> > 
> > ----
> > 
> > I'll try to 
  turn new files around as quickly as possible 
> but can make no promises 
  beyond the stated 5 business day SLA.
> > 
> > 
  Regards,
> > 
> > Mary
> > 
> > 
> 
  >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Paul Fremantle 
  [mailto:]
> >> Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 12:43 
  PM
> >> To: 
> >> Cc: 
  ; ; 
> >> 
  
> >> Subject: Re: [ws-rx] Groups - 
  ws-rx_cd05.zip uploaded
> >>
> >> Mary
> 
  >>
> >> The basic situation is that 22286 has more beautiful 
  HTML and
> >> 22268 has the images in it.
> >>
> 
  >> I propose that we go with 22268 for PR (since it is more 
> 
  accurate if 
> >> less beautiful) and that in the meantime the 
  editors will 
> prepare a 
> >> beautified version of the 
  HTML that will be the basis of our CS.
> >>
> >> 
  Please remember to include our HTML disclaimer!
> >>
> 
  >> Thanks
> >>
> >> Paul
> 
  >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Mary McRae 
  wrote:
> >>> So I should use this one (22286) rather than 
  22268?
> >>>
> >>> m
> 
  >>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> 
  >>>> From:  
  [mailto:]
> >>>> Sent: Thursday, 
  February 08, 2007 8:16 PM
> >>>> To: 
  
> >>>> Cc: 
  
> >>>> Subject: [ws-rx] Groups - 
  ws-rx_cd05.zip uploaded
> >>>>
> >>>> 
  Replaced HTML versions with Marc Goodner's better HTML files.
> 
  >>>>
> >>>>  -- Gilbert Pilz
> 
  >>>>
> >>>> The document revision named 
  ws-rx_cd05.zip has been submitted by 
> >>>> Gilbert Pilz to 
  the OASIS Web Services Reliable Exchange
> >>>> (WS-RX) TC 
  document repository.  This document is revision #1 of 
> 
  >>>> ws-rx_cd05.zip.
> >>>>
> 
  >>>> Document Description:
> >>>> Complete WS-RX 
  CD05 package in proper directory 
> structure and RDDL 
> 
  >>>> files.
> >>>> Replaced HTML versions with 
  Marc Goodner's better HTML files.
> >>>>
> 
  >>>> View Document Details:
> >>>> 
  http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/document.ph
> 
  >>>> p?document_id=22286
> >>>>
> 
  >>>> Download Document:  
> >>>> 
  http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/download.ph
> 
  >>>> p/22286/ws-rx_cd05.zip
> >>>>
> 
  >>>> Revision:
> >>>> This document is revision 
  #1 of ws-rx_cd05.zip.  The
> >> document details
> 
  >>>> page referenced above will show the complete revision 
  history.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> 
  >>>> PLEASE NOTE:  If the above links do not work for you, 
  your email 
> >>>> application may be breaking the link into 
  two pieces.
> >>>> You may be able to copy and paste the 
  entire link 
> address into the 
> >>>> address field 
  of your web browser.
> >>>>
> >>>> -OASIS 
  Open Administration
> >>>>
> >>>
> 
  >> --
> >> Paul Fremantle
> >> VP/Technology and 
  Partnerships, WSO2
> >> OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
> 
  >>
> >> http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle
> 
  >> 
> >> (646) 290 8050
> 
  >>
> >> "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", 
  www.wso2.com
> >>
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
  --
> Paul Fremantle
> VP/Technology and Partnerships, WSO2
> 
  OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
> 
> 
  http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle
> 
> (646) 
  290 8050
> 
> "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", 
  www.wso2.com
>