Re: [ws-rx-editors] Typos and others in RM and MC specs

From
Doug Davis <>
Date
2007-03-27T11:35:42+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [ws-rx-editors] Typos and others in RM and MC specs
Sanjay,

  thanks for the very thorough
review.  Some comments in-line.  Some questions for the editors
(and Gil specifically) too.

thanks

-Doug

______________________________________________________

STSM  |  Web Services Architect  |  IBM Software Group

(919) 254-6905  |  IBM T/L 444-6905  |  

"Patil, Sanjay"
<> 

03/27/2007 01:08 AM

To

<>

cc

Subject

[ws-rx-editors] Typos and others in
RM and MC specs

I happened to read the RM and MC specifications
a bit more carefully today (was stuck on a long flight) and here are a
list of items that I think need to be addressed. These are based on the
recently approved CD versions.

-- Sanjay 

WS-ReliableMessaging 

---------------------------------- 

437, 438 reads - The RM Destination then reclaims
any resources associated with the Sequence. 

I think this should be- The RM Source then reclaims any resources associated
with the Sequence. 

<dug> I'm actually wondering if we
should remove that sentence since the RMS shouldn't really reclaim ALL
of its resources until it gets the TerminateSequenceResponse.  What
if we removed that sentence (since step 11 talks about the RMD reclaiming)
and then adding to the end of step 11:  Upon receipt of the TerminateSequenceResponse
the RM Source can then reclaim any resources associated with the Sequence.
    Thoughts?  </dug>

739: Typo 

Replace - /wsrm:CloseSequence@{any} 

With - /wsrm:CloseSequence/@{any} 

<dug> Fixed </dug>

763: Typo 

Replace - /wsrm:CloseSequenceResponse@{any} 

With - /wsrm:CloseSequenceResponse/@{any} 

<dug> fixed </dug>

811: Typo 

Replace - for the closing Sequence 

With - for the terminating Sequence 

<dug> fixed </dug>

884: For the sake of consistency with rest
of the spec 

Replace - allow different types 

With - allow (extensible) different types 

<dug> fixed </dug>

936: Typo 

Change "As" to "as"  
<dug> fixed </dug>

1044: Typo 

Change - fault generated an RM Destination 

With - fault generated by an RM Destination <dug>
fixed </dug>

1124: Typo 

Change - wsrm:FaultCodes 

With - wsrm:FaultCode  <dug>
fixed </dug>

1130:Typo 

Change - Sequence information 

With - Sequence fault information <dug>
fixed </dug>

1133:Typo 

Change - set of fault 

With - set of faults <dug>
fixed </dug>

1138 & 1140: This text is not what is
typically used for describing extensibility elements and attributes in
the rest of the spec. Is this a cut-paste error?

<dug> what do others think about this
one? I think its just trying to say that "implemenation specific"
info will go there. </dug>

1241, 1242: Can't parse this sentence
 <dug> Gil - what words are
missing? Is there just an "at" missing before the "some"?
Will hold off fixing this until I hear from you.</dug>

1259: Typo 

Replace - ability identify 

With - ability to identify <dug>
fixed </dug>

1410: Can't parse. I think replacing "and
with" by "with" might do the trick.
<dug> Fixed - Gil, you ok with
this? </dug>

1515: Can't parse. I think replacing "use
inclusion" by "inclusion" might do the trick
<dug> Fixed. Gil? </dug>

1632: The fault wsrm:UnsupportedSelection
is not described in the main spec. It should be moved to MC spec!
 <dug> Fixed </dug>

WS-MakeConnection 

------------------------------- 

279: Typo 

Replace - "of a two" 

With - "of two"  <dug>
Fixed </dug>

454:Typo 

Replace - /wsmc:MessagePending@pending 

With - /wsmc:MessagePending/@pending <dug>
Fixed </dug>

633: Typo 

Replace - UnsupportedElement 

With - UnspportedSelection <dug>
Fixed </dug>

<Also MissingSelection fault is currently
not defined in the schema> <dug>
do we need to?  I don't think there are any new elements defined for
this fault </dug>

851: Fix the font towards the end of this
sentence   <dug>
Do you mean the 'S' ?  if so, we were trying to make the CS plural</dug>