RE: [ws-rx-editors] Typos and others in RM and MC specs

as soon as I hit 'enter' on the note
below I noticed that the dates on the footers were wrong. 

Everything checked-in - yet again.

Forgot to mention.... html/diff's are
in the zip file too.

thanks

-Doug

______________________________________________________

STSM  |  Web Services Architect  |  IBM Software Group

(919) 254-6905  |  IBM T/L 444-6905  |  

Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS

03/27/2007 11:37 AM

To

"Patil, Sanjay" <>

cc



Subject

RE: [ws-rx-editors] Typos and others
in RM and MC specs

ok - I fixed the 'S' thingy.  For others - Sanjay and I talked and
we'll leave the other things 'as is'.  Gil looked over the security
fixes and was 'ok' with them. 

I've uploaded everything to the editor's CD9 folder, the TC's "Lastest..."
files as well as created a new CD9 folder in the TC's doc area.

All - Please give them a quick scan to make sure everything looks ok.

thanks

-Doug

______________________________________________________

STSM  |  Web Services Architect  |  IBM Software Group

(919) 254-6905  |  IBM T/L 444-6905  |  

"Patil, Sanjay"
<> 

03/27/2007 09:06 AM

To

Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS

cc

<>

Subject

RE: [ws-rx-editors] Typos and others
in RM and MC specs

At this point of time, I am inclined to leave out anything that is not
a showstopper but has potential semantic impact. Please see my answers
inline ... 

  

Can we send out an updated version (that also addresses the idea of references
to both 1.2 and 1.5 wsp versions) today? If we want to make progress on
this front on this week's call, it will be good to provide couple of days
to the TC for review. 

  

-- Sanjay 

From: Doug Davis [mailto:]

Sent: Tuesday, Mar 27, 2007 7:35 AM

To: Patil, Sanjay

Cc: 

Subject: Re: [ws-rx-editors] Typos and others in RM and MC specs

Sanjay, 

 thanks for the very thorough review.  Some comments in-line.  Some
questions for the editors (and Gil specifically) too.

thanks

-Doug

______________________________________________________

STSM  |  Web Services Architect  |  IBM Software Group

(919) 254-6905  |  IBM T/L 444-6905  |  

"Patil, Sanjay"
<> 

03/27/2007 01:08 AM

To

<>

cc

Subject

[ws-rx-editors] Typos and others in
RM and MC specs

I happened to read the RM and MC specifications
a bit more carefully today (was stuck on a long flight) and here are a
list of items that I think need to be addressed. These are based on the
recently approved CD versions. 

-- Sanjay 

WS-ReliableMessaging 

---------------------------------- 

437, 438 reads - The RM Destination then reclaims
any resources associated with the Sequence. 

I think this should be- The RM Source then reclaims any resources associated
with the Sequence. 

<dug> I'm actually wondering if we
should remove that sentence since the RMS shouldn't really reclaim ALL
of its resources until it gets the TerminateSequenceResponse.  What
if we removed that sentence (since step 11 talks about the RMD reclaiming)
and then adding to the end of step 11:  Upon receipt of the TerminateSequenceResponse
the RM Source can then reclaim any resources associated with the Sequence.
    Thoughts?  </dug>  

<Sanjay> Let us leave as-is
</Sanjay>   

739: Typo 

Replace - /wsrm:CloseSequence@{any} 

With - /wsrm:CloseSequence/@{any} 

<dug> Fixed </dug>

763: Typo 

Replace - /wsrm:CloseSequenceResponse@{any} 

With - /wsrm:CloseSequenceResponse/@{any} 

<dug> fixed </dug>

811: Typo 

Replace - for the closing Sequence 

With - for the terminating Sequence 

<dug> fixed </dug>

884: For the sake of consistency with rest
of the spec 

Replace - allow different types 

With - allow (extensible) different types 

<dug> fixed </dug>

936: Typo 

Change "As" to "as"  
<dug> fixed </dug> 

1044: Typo 

Change - fault generated an RM Destination 

With - fault generated by an RM Destination <dug>
fixed </dug> 

1124: Typo 

Change - wsrm:FaultCodes 

With - wsrm:FaultCode  <dug>
fixed </dug> 

1130:Typo 

Change - Sequence information 

With - Sequence fault information <dug>
fixed </dug> 

1133:Typo 

Change - set of fault 

With - set of faults <dug>
fixed </dug> 

1138 & 1140: This text is not what is
typically used for describing extensibility elements and attributes in
the rest of the spec. Is this a cut-paste error? 

<dug> what do others think about this
one? I think its just trying to say that "implemenation specific"
info will go there. </dug>  

<Sanjay> Since there seems
to be at least some way to justify this variation,  I suggest we leave
this as-is </Sajay>   

1241, 1242: Can't parse this sentence
 <dug> Gil - what words are
missing? Is there just an "at" missing before the "some"?
Will hold off fixing this until I hear from you.</dug>

1259: Typo 

Replace - ability identify 

With - ability to identify <dug>
fixed </dug> 

1410: Can't parse. I think replacing "and
with" by "with" might do the trick.
<dug> Fixed - Gil, you ok with
this? </dug> 

1515: Can't parse. I think replacing "use
inclusion" by "inclusion" might do the trick
<dug> Fixed. Gil? </dug>

1632: The fault wsrm:UnsupportedSelection
is not described in the main spec. It should be moved to MC spec!
 <dug> Fixed </dug>

WS-MakeConnection 

------------------------------- 

279: Typo 

Replace - "of a two" 

With - "of two"  <dug>
Fixed </dug> 

454:Typo 

Replace - /wsmc:MessagePending@pending 

With - /wsmc:MessagePending/@pending <dug>
Fixed </dug> 

633: Typo 

Replace - UnsupportedElement 

With - UnspportedSelection <dug>
Fixed </dug> 

<Also MissingSelection fault is currently
not defined in the schema> <dug>
do we need to?  I don't think there are any new elements defined for
this fault </dug>  

<Sanjay> I am not sure I
understand. The text describes this fault type. So I was assuming that
the schema needs to capture that. Am I missing something? </Sanjay>
  

851: Fix the font towards the end of this
sentence   <dug>
Do you mean the 'S' ?  if so, we were trying to make the CS plural</dug>
 

<Sanjay> That's right. The
"s)" part seems to be in a different font. That's all.