RE: Draft package for OS submission

From
Mary McRae <>
Date
2007-04-09T12:07:16+00:00
ID
007201c77a9f$9c904dc0$640fa8c0@espresso
Thread
RE: Draft package for OS submission
Title: Draft package for OS submission

Hi Sanjay,

 

  Two things in your draft submission message need to 
be fixed.

1. Links to specifications. You're using the "latest 
version" links rather than the "this version" links. These links must be to a 
fixed reference and not something that will change over 
time.

 

2. statements of use. Please add the name of the 
organization above each of the URIs.

 

Thanks!

 

Mary

 

 

  

  
  From: Patil, Sanjay 
  [mailto:] 
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2007 1:38 
  AM
To: ; 
Cc: 
  
Subject: Draft package for OS 
  submission

  

  
Hi Mary, 

  
Please see below for the draft package for 
  the OS submission. The ZIP package referenced in the attached email includes 
  the drafts for OS submission.

  
<<[ws-rx-editors] Groups - 
  WS-RX_CS_DirStructured.zip uploaded>> 
Please let me know if anything is missing, or needs 
  to be corrected, etc. 

  
Thanks, 
Sanjay 

  
_______________________________________________________________ 
  
The Web Services Reliable Exchange (WS-RX) 
  TC has submitted the 
following 
  specification set: 

  
(a) Links to the approved Committee 
  Specification in the TC's document 
repository, and any appropriate supplemental documentation for 
  the 
specification, both of which 
  must be written using the OASIS templates. 
The specification may not have been changed between its approval as 
  a 
Committee Specification and its 
  submission to OASIS for consideration as 
an OASIS Standard, except for the changes on the title page and 
  running 
footer noting the approval 
  status and date. 

  
Web Services ReliableMessaging 1.1 
  
PDF - http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/v1.1/wsrm.pdf 
  
HTML - http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/v1.1/wsrm.html 
  
Schema - 
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/200702/wsrm-1.1-schema-200702.xsd 
  
WSDL - 
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/200702/wsdl/wsrm-1.1-wsdl-200702.wsdl 
  

  
Web Services ReliableMessaging Policy 
  1.1 
PDF - http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrmp/v1.1/wsrmp.pdf 
  
HTML - http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrmp/v1.1/wsrmp.html 
  
Schema - 
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrmp/200702/wsrmp-1.1-schema-200702.xsd 
  

  
Web Services MakeConnection 1.0 
  
PDF - http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsmc/v1.0/wsmc.pdf 
  
HTML - http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsmc/v1.0/wsmc.html 
  
SCHEMA - 
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsmc/200702/wsmc-1.0-schema-200702.xsd 
  
WSDL - 
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsmc/200702/wsdl/wsmc-1.0-wsdl-200702.wsdl 
  

  
(b) The editable version of all files that 
  are part of the Committee 
Specification; 

  
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/v1.1/wsrm.doc 
  
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrmp/v1.1/wsrmp.doc 
  
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsmc/v1.0/wsmc.doc 

  
(c) Certification by the TC that all schema 
  and XML instances included 
in the 
  specification, whether by inclusion or reference, including 
fragments of such, are well formed, and that all 
  expressions are valid; 

  
All schema and XML instances included in 
  the specification are well 
formed 
  and all expressions are valid. 

  
(d) A clear English-language summary of the 
  specification; 

  
The WS-ReliableMessaging 1.1 specification 
  consists of multiple parts. 

  
The core WS-ReliableMessaging 1.1 document 
  defines a protocol for 
reliable 
  message exchange between two Web services, even in the presence 
  
of network or system failures. For 
  example, the protocol can ensure the 
resending of messages that have been lost, and can ensure that 
  duplicate 
messages are not 
  delivered. The protocol allows Web service nodes to 
implement a variety of delivery assurances, 
  including At Most Once, At 
Least 
  Once, Exactly Once and In Order delivery of messages. The protocol 
  
fundamentally defines a one-way reliable 
  channel (known as a Sequence), 
but 
  also includes mechanisms to optimize the creation of two-way 
reliable exchanges. The protocol is designed to 
  compose with other 
relevant 
  standards such as WS-Security and WS-SecureConversation. The 
protocol allows developers to add reliable delivery 
  of messages to their 
applications 
  on a variety of platforms, including Java and .NET. 

  
The WS-ReliableMessaging Policy 1.1 
  document defines an XML policy 
language that enables Web services to advertise their support for 
  the 
WS-ReliableMessaging 
  specification. The specification is designed for 
use with the WS-Policy Framework. The language aids 
  the interoperability 
of nodes that 
  support WS-ReliableMessaging by publishing their support 
and requirements for aspects of reliable messaging. 
  For example, an 
endpoint may use 
  this specification to indicate that it requires that 
the reliable message protocol to be secured using 
  transport level 
security. 
  WS-ReliableMessaging Policy is designed to be used with other 
policy languages, such as WS-Security Policy, in the 
  scope of the 
WS-Policy 
  Framework. 

  
The WS-MakeConnection 1.0 document defines 
  a protocol that can be 
used to 
  allow two-way communications when only a transport specific 
back-channel (such as the HTTP response mechanism) 
  is available. For 
example, this 
  allows a client to establish a two-way reliable 
message exchange even in the presence of firewalls 
  and network address 
translation, 
  that otherwise would prevent the server from initiating 
connections to the client. 

  
(e) A statement regarding the relationship 
  of this specification to 
similar 
  work of other OASIS TCs or other standards developing organizations; 
  

  
-- The OASIS WS-Reliable Messaging (WSRM) 
  TC also defines a reliable 
messaging specification for Web services. The WS-RX TC and 
  
WS-ReliableMessaging specification focuses 
  on creating a specification 
that 
  works in conjunction with and composes with other specifications, 
  
in particular the WS-Addressing, 
  WS-Security and WS-SecureConversation, 
and WS-Policy Framework specifications. 

  
(f) Certification by at least three OASIS 
  member organizations that they 
are 
  successfully using the specification; 

  
Certification via email: 
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/email/archives/200702/msg00068.html 
  
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/email/archives/200702/msg00069.html 
  
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/email/archives/200703/msg00000.html 
  

  
Confirmation of applicability of the 
  certification for the latest drafts: 
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/email/archives/200703/msg00114.html 
  

  
(g) The beginning and ending dates of the 
  public review(s), a pointer to 
the 
  announcement of the public review(s), and a pointer to an account of 
  
each of the comments/issues raised during 
  the public review period(s), 
along 
  with its resolution; 

  
First Public Review: 24 August 2006 to 21 
  October 2006 
Second Public Review: 
  12 February 2007 to 27 February 2007 

  
Announcement of the first Public 
  Review: 
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/tc-announce/200608/msg00005.html 
  

  
Announcement of the second Public 
  Review: 
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/tc-announce/200702/msg00004.html 
  

  
Public Review Issue and Resolution 
  Log: 
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/pr/Issues.xml 
  

  
(h) An account of and results of the voting 
  to approve the specification 
as a 
  Committee Specification, including the date of the ballot and a 
  
pointer to the ballot; 

  
TBD 

  
(i) An account of or pointer to votes and 
  comments received in any 
earlier 
  attempts to standardize substantially the same specification, 
together with the originating TC's response to each 
  comment; 

  
This is the first submission to the OASIS 
  membership 

  
(j) A pointer to the publicly visible 
  comments archive for the 
originating TC; 

  
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-rx-comment/ 

  
(k) A pointer to any minority reports 
  submitted by one or more Members 
who did not vote in favor of approving the Committee 
  Specification, 
which report may 
  include statements regarding why the member voted 
against the specification or that the member 
  believes that Substantive 
Changes 
  were made which have not gone through public review; or 
certification by the Chair that no minority reports 
  exist. 

  
There are no minority reports.