Re: [ws-rx-editors] Issue 161

I can go either way on this one.  If
it looks silly in the errata then I'm ok with deferring it to v.Next.

thanks

-Doug

______________________________________________________

STSM  |  Web Services Architect  |  IBM Software Group

(919) 254-6905  |  IBM T/L 444-6905  |  

Marc Goodner <>

10/02/2007 01:44 PM

To

Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS

cc

""
<>

Subject

[ws-rx-editors] Issue 161

Doug, 

 

Regarding changing the font as errata,
I agree it is errata and would be nice to do. You are aware that any errata
has to show before and after though right? So the errata only version would
be primarily be:

Changed

Font

to

Font

 

So for that portion of the issue it might
be better to handle it in the v.Next version rather than in the errata.
What do you think?