RE: [ws-rx-editors] Public Review of WSRM specifications

Hi Mary,

 

Please consider this as a formal request for starting the 
Public Review of the CDs [1]. The WS-RX TC voted with Full Majority on 2/28/08 
conf-call [2] to submit these CDs for Public 
Review.

 

Thanks,

Sanjay

Co-Chair, OASIS WS-RX TC

 

[1] http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx-editors/download.php/27417/WS-RX_OS_DirStructured.zip 

[2] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-rx/200802/msg00045.html

  

  
  From: Doug Davis [mailto:] 
  
Sent: Thursday, Feb 28, 2008 20:41 PM
To: Patil, 
  Sanjay
Cc: ; 
  
Subject: Re: [ws-rx-editors] 
  Public Review of WSRM specifications

  

Mary - please use [1] instead. 
   It contains all of the files in the proper OASIS dir structure. 
   The files themselves are the same with one exception - the word doc in 
  [1] has all of the changes accepted.  People outside of the TC don't need 
  to see the change bars. 

[1] 
  http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx-editors/download.php/27417/WS-RX_OS_DirStructured.zip 
  

thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM 
   |  Web Services Architect  |  IBM Software Group
(919) 
  254-6905  |  IBM T/L 444-6905  |   
  

  
    
    

      "Patil, Sanjay" 
        <> 
        
02/28/2008 06:53 PM 

      
        
          
          

            
              
To

            <> 
          

            
              
cc

            <> 
          

            
              
Subject

            [ws-rx-editors] Public Review of 
              WSRM specifications

        
          
          

            
            

  
Hi Mary, 
  
This is to give you a heads up that the WS-RX TC 
  voted with Full Majority on 2/28 conf-call to submit our latest CDs  for 
  Public Review. The editors are preparing the final package for submission. 
  Meanwhile, if you could also verify the latest package [1] for any potential 
  issues, that will be great. 
  
I also have one question for you -- How long would 
  this PR cycle be, given that these latest CD drafts are a result of the 
  progression of the last OS version (i.e. the latest CD drafts = OS draft + 
  approved errata + some issue resolutions)? The version numbers of latest CD 
  drafts are different than that of their last OS versions, but there are no 
  changes to the namespace defined by these specifications. 
  
Thanks, 
Sanjay 
  
[1] http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/download.php/27414/WSRX%20v1.2-CD01.zip