s/2004/2005/g
From: Patil, Sanjay
[mailto:]
Sent: Tuesday, Dec 06, 2005 11:28
AM
To: Doug Davis;
Subject: RE: [ws-rx-implement]
Interoperability and the F2F
I think this group should first clearly outline its
touch points with the TC in regards to the inputs from this group to the TC
that may possibly affect the TC deliverables, timeline dependencies, etc. For
example, I don't see how a schedule for producing a scenario doc by
itself would be of any interest to the larger TC.
Given that a scenarios doc or an interop report is not
part of the TC deliverables as such, I believe that the TC would at most
expect this group to validate the spec by producing interop scenarios and by
conducting the actual interop testing. In that regard, the TC may want to know
the overall timeline of this subgroup so that any issues revealed in the
process of creating the scenarios and conducting the interop get filed and
resolved early on and more importantly well within the chartered time period
of the TC (one year from Jun 23, 2004).
So may I suggest that this subgroup first present to the
TC the high level roadmap and schedule of its activities (creating scenario
doc, hosting interop, consolidating issues, second run of the previous steps,
etc). It will obviously be great if this subgroup can in addition report on
any concrete plans/material for the initial milestones at the
F2F.
Thanks,
Sanjay
From: Doug Davis [mailto:]
Sent: Tuesday, Dec 06, 2005 10:54 AM
To:
Subject: Re:
[ws-rx-implement] Interoperability and the F2F
I think this group should give
the a TC a date for when it can provide an initial draft of a scenario doc
and a proposed date for an interop event.
Perhaps we could, thru email, settle on a target date we could
propose to the TC during the f2f?
What about end of Jan (27th?) as a target?
-Doug
Paul Fremantle
<>
12/06/2005 01:33 PM
To
cc
Subject
[ws-rx-implement]
Interoperability and the F2F
Folks
This group has been silent since it started. In
order that we are
effective at the F2F it would be good to start the
discussions now.
Firstly, what agenda items would you like to discuss
at the F2F.
We have a rough plan to have remote based interop
following the next
Committee Draft.
I think we need a review of
the donated interop scenarios based on two
aspects:
1) are
they complete enough?
2) how do they need to change based on the updated
specifications?
Paul
--
Paul
Fremantle
VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
"Oxygenating
the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
Yahoo IM:
paulfremantle
VOIP: +44 844 986 2874
Cell/Mobile: +44 (0) 7740 199
729
Fax: +44 844 484 7459
