Next in thread →
Next in month →
RE: [ws-rx-implement] Question about the proposed security scenarios
Which form of MakeConnection?
From: Doug Davis
[mailto:]
Sent: Sunday, September 03, 2006 1:11 PM
To: Paul Fremantle
Cc:
Subject: Re: [ws-rx-implement] Question about the proposed security
scenarios
Yup - I have
those plus a MakeConnection+SC
-Doug
Paul
Fremantle <>
09/03/2006
03:16 PM
To
Doug
Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
cc
Subject
Re:
[ws-rx-implement] Question about the proposed security scenarios
Doug
Wow.... I guess I didn't imagine we'd be able to get as far as composing
security and MakeConnection in such a short time.
I realised I had a list in mind of scenarios:
1. Secure RM with SC
2. Secure RM with SSL
3. MakeConnection with SeqID
4. MakeConnection with URI
Paul
Doug Davis wrote:
>
> I have a rough draft that I'm waiting for TonyN to look over before I
> send it out (hopefully before Monday), but yes it composes security
> with the simply one-way scenario. For composition of security
with
> MakeConnection though, I've made that one a request-reply.
> -Doug
>
>
>
> *Paul Fremantle <>*
>
> 09/03/2006 11:45 AM
>
>
> To
>
> cc
>
> Subject
>
[ws-rx-implement] Question about the proposed security scenarios
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Folks
>
> Can I assume correctly that the new security scenarios are going to be
> composed with the simplest possible 1-way scenario from phase 1.
>
> Paul
>
> --
>
> Paul Fremantle
> VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
>
> http://feeds.feedburner.com/bloglines/pzf
>
>
> "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
>
>
--
Paul Fremantle
VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
http://feeds.feedburner.com/bloglines/pzf
"Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
Next in thread →
Next in month →