Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Is an implementation supporting a smaller maxmessage number valid? [Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Max message number in policy]

From
Duane Nickull <>
Date
2005-07-14T22:36:43+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Is an implementation supporting a smaller maxmessage number valid? [Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Max message number in policy]
Christopher B Ferris wrote:

>It would take ~292,471,208.67 years to exhaust a sequence that was only 
>the size of a long 
>if you processed 1000 messages per second.
>
>
Chris:

Most underlying technologies would choke on this so it is probably a 
very good idea to let implementors declare their implementations maximum 
capacity and sub-scope it.  Consider that each message may also have to 
be stored in some form of persistent store too - this is an implementers 
nightmare if they had to have 3 trillion terrabytes available for this 
scenario. 

Duane