Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Is an implementation supporting a smaller maxmessage number valid? [Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Max message number in p olicy]

Jacques Durand wrote:

> - nothing prevents an RM destination to send back a 
> MessageNumberRollover *before* the specified maximum (unsignedLong 
> max) is reached (!)
>
DN - I would like to propose that this be noted in the interop scenarios 
document when revised.  Is there an issues list/parking lot for stuff 
like this for interop?