Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: semantics of "at most once" delivery assurance

Christopher B Ferris wrote:

>However, the protocol as specified would never be able to complete a 
>sequence
>if there are lost messages from the RMD perspective and the RMS is not
>retransmitting them.
>  
>
why so? as RMD, if i see a gap or AckRequested for a sequence number i 
have not received and i am operating in "at least once" mode with my AD, 
why cant i just send an Ack? if i did so, wouldn't that enable us to 
complete the sequence?

thanks,
dan