I will volunteer to take i012. Also, from looking at the issues list, I
would like to make the following corrections.
1. i012 should be targeted to core, not soap.
2. From the issues summary, I'm the "unknown" person that raised i001 at
the F2F.
Lei
-----Original Message-----
From: Marc Goodner [mailto:]
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 12:17 PM
To:
Subject: [ws-rx] Unowned issues
We need owners for the following issues:
<http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/13758/ReliableMessagi
ngIssues.xml#i001#i001> i001
Bilateral sequence negotiation
<http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/13758/ReliableMessagi
ngIssues.xml#i002#i002> i002
AckTo EPR and seq lifetime
<http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/13758/ReliableMessagi
ngIssues.xml#i003#i003> i003
EPRs and sequence scope
<http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/13758/ReliableMessagi
ngIssues.xml#i004#i004> i004
wsa:messageID uniqueness requirments for retransmission
<http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/13758/ReliableMessagi
ngIssues.xml#i005#i005> i005
Source resend of nacks messages when ack already received
i007
<http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/13758/ReliableMessagi
ngIssues.xml#i007#i007>
WSS 1.0/1.1 token support
i010
<http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/13758/ReliableMessagi
ngIssues.xml#i010#i010>
Sequence port spanning
i012
<http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/13758/ReliableMessagi
ngIssues.xml#i012#i012>
Anonymous acksTo
i013
<http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/13758/ReliableMessagi
ngIssues.xml#i013#i013>
Max message number in policy
i018
<http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/13758/ReliableMessagi
ngIssues.xml#i018#i018>
Is an implementation supporting a smaller max message number valid?
i019
<http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/13758/ReliableMessagi
ngIssues.xml#i019#i019>
Sequence termination on Fault
Gilbert Pilz has volunteered on the editor list to take i014 - i017.
Personally I'll volunteer to take i007 will review some the others for
potentially volunteering prior to tomorrow's call. I suggest others do
the same.
I propose that we should not allow issues to be accepted any longer
without identifying an owner at the same time.
Regards,
Marc g
