No. You can't make that assumption.
Cheers,
Christopher Ferris
STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture
email:
blog: http://webpages.charter.net/chrisfer/blog.html
phone: +1 508 377 9295
Dan Leshchiner <> wrote on 07/28/2005 02:55:47 PM:
> if AS makes RMS aware that AtMostOnce is used by AD/RMD, then RMS can
assume that no
> retransmissions will be necessary and, consequently, does not need to
take up its resources to
> make retransmissions available, right?
>
> Christopher B Ferris wrote:
> I think you meant AtMostOnce mode. I suppose you could do that, but from
> the
> perspective of the RMS, it is still retransmitting until it receives an
> ack.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Christopher Ferris
> STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture
> email:
> blog: http://webpages.charter.net/chrisfer/blog.html
> phone: +1 508 377 9295
>
> Dan Leshchiner <> wrote on 07/27/2005 06:36:24 PM:
>
>
> Christopher B Ferris wrote:
>
>
> However, the protocol as specified would never be able to complete a
> sequence
> if there are lost messages from the RMD perspective and the RMS is not
> retransmitting them.
>
>
>
> why so? as RMD, if i see a gap or AckRequested for a sequence number i
> have not received and i am operating in "at least once" mode with my AD,
>
>
>
> why cant i just send an Ack? if i did so, wouldn't that enable us to
> complete the sequence?
>
> thanks,
> dan
>
>
>
