hmmm. Did I look at the wrong
version of the spec?
-Doug
"Marc Goodner"
<>
07/08/2005 03:26 PM
To
Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS,
<>
cc
Subject
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: typo
in P0S expires
I’m confused, this was corrected
in the contributed version of the spec. How did this reappear?
From: Doug Davis [mailto:]
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 12:16 PM
To:
Subject: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: typo in P0S expires
Title: typo in expires P0S
Description: per the schema spec a zero second duration needs to have the
"T" designator - so it should be PT0S not P0S.
Justification: align with schema spec ( http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#duration
)
Target: core
Proposal: simple search and replace of P0S with PT0S
easy one ;-)
-Doug
