Isn't that the RM-Interop3-Scenarios.doc in the contributed zip? It
looks like it has the correct RM namespace.
-----Original Message-----
From: Christopher B Ferris [mailto:]
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 2:59 PM
To: Lei Jin
Cc: Duane Nickull;
Subject: RE: [ws-rx] Namespace question - related to interop scenarios
Correct, the version of the scenarios I updated for the last round of
rm+sc/t interop
has all of these issues addressed (correct namespaces for ws-rm and ws-a
and removal of
no longer relevant scenarios)
<aside>now where is that thing</aside>
Cheers,
Christopher Ferris
STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture
email:
blog: http://webpages.charter.net/chrisfer/blog.html
phone: +1 508 377 9295
"Lei Jin" <> wrote on 07/08/2005 05:06:01 PM:
> Some of these interop scenario documents are for interops with earlier
> version of the WS-ReliableMessaging spec. Thus the different
namespace
> attribute. In fact, you would also notice some of the interop tests
are
> no longer applicable for the contributed version of the spec.
>
> Lei
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Duane Nickull [mailto:]
> > Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 12:54 PM
> > To:
> > Subject: [ws-rx] Namespace question - related to interop scenarios
> >
> >
> > I noticed that the interop scenarios documents use the
> > namespace attribute
> >
> > xmlns:wsrm="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/03/rm"
> >
> > while the most recent document uploaded by Chris uses:
> >
> > xmlns:wsrm="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2005/02/rm"
> >
> > I assume the latter is correct. Can someone please confirm?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Duane
> >
