Yea - I thought about that but since
superficially it could appear like a big change I
thought I'd play it safe.
-Doug
Anish Karmarkar <>
09/21/2005 02:29 AM
To
Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
cc
Subject
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Reorder
spec sections
Makes sense.
Although I would classify this issue as editorial rather than design.
-Anish
--
Doug Davis wrote:
>
> Title: Reorder spec sections
>
> Description:
> The current order in which the RM spec talks about the protocol elements
> is:
> Sequence header
> SeqAck header
> ReqAck header
> CreateSequence
> TerminateSequence
> CloseSequence
> I'd like to reorder them based on how we actually expect people to
use
> them.
>
> Justification:
> Helps in understanding the spec.
>
> Target: wsrm spec
>
> Type: design
>
> Proposal:
>
> Change the order to be:
> CreateSequence
> Sequence header
> ReqAck header
> SeqAck header
> CloseSequence
> TerminateSequence
>
> Related issues: none
