I saw no mention of what an anonymous
wsa:To means in the soap binding spec - but perhaps I missed it. If
not, then they're silent on it.
thanks,
-Doug
"Yalcinalp, Umit"
<>
09/09/2005 04:43 PM
To
Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS,
<>
cc
Subject
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: What
does 'anon' URI mean when used in AcksTo
Doug,
I think it is incorrect to characterize
that WS-Addressing is silent. It just defers the definition to the binding
where it belongs to the extent of how the definition is used for WS-Addressing
purposes only.
I would be very much in favor
of (a) or (b) for our own spec. If (b) can not be coordinated with WS-Addressing
wg (we need to do that rather fast due to the timelines of WS-Addressing)
, we should definitely explore (a).
Cheers,
--umit
From: Doug Davis [mailto:]
Sent: Friday, Sep 09, 2005 11:42 AM
To:
Subject: Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: What does 'anon' URI mean when used
in AcksTo
Is WS-Addressing's silence on what it means to use the anonymous IRI in
the wsa:To header mean that it should be obvious to the reader? If
so, then perhaps we can take the same approach to its use in other places
that WS-Addressing is silent as well - for example, AcksTo - and say nothing
and assume its obvious to the reader.
thanks
-Doug
Anish Karmarkar <> wrote on 09/09/2005
02:20:12 AM:
> As discussed on the call today, I'm raising an issue about the meaning
> of 'anon' URI when used in AcksTo URI.
>
> Title:
>
> What does 'anon' URI mean when used in AcksTo EPR?
>
> Description:
>
> WS-Addressing Core [1], section 2.1 says the following about 'anon':
>
> "Some endpoints cannot be located with a meaningful IRI; this
URI is
> used to allow such endpoints to send and receive messages. The precise
> meaning of this URI is defined by the binding of Addressing to a
> specific protocol."
>
> WS-Addressing SOAP binding [2] defines what the 'anon' address means
> when used with ReplyTo and FaultTo in SOAP and SOAP/HTTP binding.
It
> does not say anything about what it means when used in other headers
> such as AcksTo.
>
> Justification:
>
> WSRM defines AcksTo element of type EndpointReferenceType and allows
> 'anon' URI for the address. But the meaning of such an anon address
is
> not defined anywhere.
>
> Target:
>
> core, soap
>
> Type:
>
> design
>
> Proposal:
>
> This can be resolved by:
>
> a) Adding a stmt similar to WS-Addressing SOAP binding. Something
like:
>
> "When "http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing/anonymous"
is specified as
> the address of the wsrm:AcksTo EPR, the underlying SOAP protocol binding
> provides a channel to the specified endpoint. Any underlying protocol
> binding supporting the SOAP request-response message exchange pattern
> provides such a channel. For instance, the SOAP 1.2 HTTP binding[SOAP
> 1.2 Part 2: Adjuncts] puts the reply message in the HTTP response."
>
> OR
>
> b) we could ask the WS-Addressing WG to fix their SOAP binding to
> include not just ReplyTo and FaultTo EPRs but any EPR when used in
the
> context of SOAP/HTTP binding.
>
> I prefer that we do (b). If they refuse, we can do (a)
>
> Related issues:
> i012
>
>
