I'm not sure I agree that this restricts the sequence to a single
endpoint. It simply associates the endpoint with the sequence (in the
same way that there is a CS endpoint associated with the initial sequence).
Paul
Anish Karmarkar wrote:
> I have a question on the resolution of issue i090 as recorded at
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/download.php/17304/MinutesWSRX-031606.html
>
>
> The resolution restricts the offered sequence to a single EPR. This
> constraints/conflicts with the resolution of an issue (can't recall
> the issue number) that introduced that following text at line 139-140
> (in CD-03):
>
> "Note that this specification makes no restriction on the scope of the
> RM Source or RM Destination entities. For example, either may span
> multiple WSDL Ports or endpoints."
>
> The intent of that resolution was to allow RMD and RMS to span
> multiple WSDL endpoints, EPRs etc. Was this conflict discussed during
> the concall? At least in the minutes this is not captured. If it was
> discussed, can someone post the rationale for reverting the previous
> decision? Was there any discussion on making
> /wsrm:CreateSequence/wsrm:Offer/wsrm:Endpoint optional?
>
> Thx!
>
> -Anish
> --
--
Paul Fremantle
VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
http://feeds.feedburner.com/bloglines/pzf
"Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
