Paul Fremantle wrote:
> I'm not sure I agree that this restricts the sequence to a single
> endpoint. It simply associates the endpoint with the sequence (in the
> same way that there is a CS endpoint associated with the initial sequence).
>
I'm not sure I follow (very likely missing your point) -- specifically I
don't know what you mean by '... CS endpoint associated with the
*initial sequence*'.
The resolution of i090 says this about the specified endpoint:
"This REQUIRED element, of type wsa:EndpointReferenceType as specified
by WS-Addressing [WSAddressing] specifies the endpoint reference to
which WS-RM protocol messages related to the offered Sequence are to be
sent."
In the non-offered sequence, RMD/RMS are fuzzy concepts not necessarily
associated with a single EPR. For example, we talk about sending
terminate message to the "RMD" not to a particular EPR. Doesn't this
resolution change that for offered sequences? I.e., doesn't this
resolution restrict the RMD to the specified EPR (for the offered sequence)?
Thanks for the response.
-Anish
--
> Paul
>
> Anish Karmarkar wrote:
>
>> I have a question on the resolution of issue i090 as recorded at
>> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/download.php/17304/MinutesWSRX-031606.html
>>
>>
>> The resolution restricts the offered sequence to a single EPR. This
>> constraints/conflicts with the resolution of an issue (can't recall
>> the issue number) that introduced that following text at line 139-140
>> (in CD-03):
>>
>> "Note that this specification makes no restriction on the scope of the
>> RM Source or RM Destination entities. For example, either may span
>> multiple WSDL Ports or endpoints."
>>
>> The intent of that resolution was to allow RMD and RMS to span
>> multiple WSDL endpoints, EPRs etc. Was this conflict discussed during
>> the concall? At least in the minutes this is not captured. If it was
>> discussed, can someone post the rationale for reverting the previous
>> decision? Was there any discussion on making
>> /wsrm:CreateSequence/wsrm:Offer/wsrm:Endpoint optional?
>>
>> Thx!
>>
>> -Anish
>> --
>
>
