Next in thread →
Next in month →
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: figure 2 out of date
Chris, Could you please point out the difference between your proposed figure and the existing one. Perhaps it's the blurriness of the picture that is making it difficult for me to see the difference. Also, I am not sure how your proposed figure matches your issue justification (does not reflect Close() operation). -- Sanjay From: Christopher B Ferris [mailto:] Sent: Friday, Apr 07, 2006 11:42 AM To: Patil, Sanjay; Subject: RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: figure 2 out of date I mean replace figure 2 with this one Cheers, Christopher Ferris STSM, Software Group Standards Strategy email: blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/dw_blog.jspa?blog=440 phone: +1 508 377 9295 "Patil, Sanjay" <> 04/07/2006 02:07 PM To Christopher B Ferris/Waltham/IBM@IBMUS, "WS-RX TC" <> cc Subject RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: figure 2 out of date I thought that once a Sequence is closed and a final Ack is sent, the RMD does not accept any new messages (other than protocol messages) in that sequence. Am I missing something? -- Sanjay From: Christopher B Ferris [mailto:] Sent: Friday, Apr 07, 2006 5:22 AM To: WS-RX TC Subject: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: figure 2 out of date Title: Figure 2 (cd3) [1] is out of date with the changes to the potocol Description: Figure 2 (cd3) [1] is out of date with the changes to the potocol Justification: does not reflect Close() operation Target: core Proposal: replace Figure 2 graphic with this one [1] http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/200602/wsrm-1.1-spec-cd-03.pdf Cheers, Christopher Ferris STSM, Software Group Standards Strategy email: blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/dw_blog.jspa?blog=440 phone: +1 508 377 9295
Next in thread →
Next in month →