RE: [ws-rx] issue 115: clarifying question

From
Marc Goodner <>
Date
2006-04-24T21:58:04+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [ws-rx] issue 115: clarifying question
Why would anything
need to go in the header? The spec that defines the header would define what if
any relationship it had to body content.

 

Marc Goodner

Technical Diplomat

Microsoft Corporation

Tel: (425) 703-1903

Blog: http://spaces.msn.com/mrgoodner/ 

From: Gilbert Pilz
[mailto:] 

Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 2:41
PM

To: wsrx

Subject: [ws-rx] issue 115:
clarifying question

 

During the
conference call of 4/20/2006 Chris asserted that you can use a SOAP header with
a mustUnderstand attribute to flag the fact that some element in either another
header or in the message body is an extension that must be understood by the
receiver. I'm not sure I understood exactly what Chris thought this should look
like. For example, imagine the following CreateSequence message. The extension
elements have been marked in bold. What is supposed to go in the
<wsrm:Extension> header?

<?xml version="1.0"
encoding="UTF-8"?>

<S:Envelope xmlns:S="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope"

xmlns:wsrm="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/200604"

xmlns:wsa="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing">

 <S:Header>

 
<wsrm:Extension S:mustUnderstand="1">

   
????

 
</wsrm:Extension>

  <wsa:MessageID>

   http://Business456.com/guid/0baaf88d-483b-4ecf-a6d8-a7c2eb546817

 
</wsa:MessageID>

  <wsa:To>http://example.com/serviceB/123</wsa:To>

    <wsa:Action>http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/200604/CreateSequence</wsa:Action>

  <wsa:ReplyTo>

   <wsa:Address>http://Business456.com/serviceA/789</wsa:Address>

  </wsa:ReplyTo>

 </S:Header>

 <S:Body>

  <wsrm:CreateSequence>

    <wsrm:AcksTo>

      <wsa:Address>http://Business456.com/serviceA/789</wsa:Address>

    </wsrm:AcksTo>

   
<wsrm:SecurityComposition>

     
<wsrm:Identifier>

       
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrmsp/200604/profile/http_auth/samenode

     
</wsrm:Identifier>

   
</wsrm:SecurityComposition>

  </wsrm:CreateSequence>

 </S:Body>

</S:Envelope>

I'm sure that most of us could all come up with a reasonable design to do what
you suggest, but for the purposes of further discussion I'd like to know what
design Chris had in mind?

- gp