← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Revised proposal for 122, 123, 124
All, This proposal has redline from our last that include changes to: · Indicate that the intention of the STR in the CS is to explicitly identify the token to be used to secure the RM sequence (as there may be more than one token in the message) · Call out that the normal WSS faulting behavior is not effected · Update some of the wording per i135 Regards, Marc g Securing RM Sequences.doc
← Prev in month
← Prev in thread