Next in thread →
Next in month →
RE: [ws-rx] PR001 - new MC spec direction
+1 From: Doug Davis [mailto:] Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 10:10 AM To: Subject: [ws-rx] PR001 - new MC spec direction On last week's call we were asked to write up something that would describe the scope/details of the proposal we made w.r.t. moving MakeConnection into a new spec. I think the text below should cover that. Proposal: Move MakeConnection into a new specification Details: Move the MakeConnection (and related portions of the RM spec) into a new specification that will be developed by the WS-RX TC. The overall scope of the TC itself will remain the same. The scope of this new specification will be limited to the development of a mechanism that will establish a transport-specific back-channel. This back-channel will be used in situations where an anonymous URI is used as the destination EPR for messages and there is no existing/appropriate back-channel available. The specification will try to address the use-cases that have be identified during the recently discussions in the WS-RX TC. These include: - Attempt to not restrict the RM processing model choices when switching from async to sync MEPs - Support for multiple endpoints behind a virtual RM processor - Support for gateway scenarios (on RMS and RMD) - Support for allowing an RMS to advertise its support for MC - Support for allowing an RMD to advertise its intention to use MC - Support for anonymous AcksTo (in particular for the Sequence Faults) - Support for unreliable-in/reliable out scenarios - Retain the notion of the RMS being the initiator of new Sequences - Support for uniquely identifying anonymous endpoints As this specification will compose on top of the base WS-RM specification, the base WS-RM specification's issues will be prioritize over the MC issues. The list of PR issues that this new specification will address are: i001 WS-Addressing comment on ws-rm related to use of extended anonymous uri ws-rm design * i015 RMD polling ws-rm, ws-rmp design i027 Where do Sequence Faults go when the RMS is anonymous ws-rm design i028 MakeConnection preconditions are unclear ws-rm design i029 Opaqueness of URI identifiers not preserved by RM anon URI ws-rm design i030 Facilities to support optional MakeConnection underspecified ws-rm design i031 Scope of MakeConnection is unconstrained ws-rm design thanks -Doug __________________________________________________ STSM | Web Services Architect | IBM Software Group (919) 254-6905 | IBM T/L 444-6906 |
Next in thread →
Next in month →