Re: [ws-sx] WS-SX TC Minutes, April 4, 2007

Hi Tony,

I think it's great that you are going into these scenarios

in depth, it will result in a much higher value document.

One request I have is that if you could submit the issues

as you encounter them, or at least batched every couple

of days that would really help us get started addressing

them.

Given that the WS-SecurityPolicy technology is so new,

many of us do not have access to working systems that

we can test against, and so it is a bit like trying to be a

human compiler/parser. We will miss many obvious typos.

I am making an effort to get a working system myself,

however, it may take more than a week or two.

Therefore, any info we can get early, on the nature of the

problems, will help expedite the processing.

    Thanks,

    Rich

Anthony Nadalin wrote:

  
Once we finish testing all the scenarios we will open up issues on
each problem we found so the TC can track these. The other issue we are
looking at now is "are these valid message patterns" that show best
practice.

  

Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122

  Rich Levinson
<>

  

  

  
    
      

        
        
          
            
              
                Rich Levinson
<> 
                
04/04/2007 08:45 PM

              
            
          
        
        
        
        
          
            

              

              
To

              
              

              Anthony Nadalin/Austin/IBM@IBMUS
            

            

              

              
cc

              
              

              Greg Carpenter
<>, ""
<>
            

            

              

              
Subject

              
              

              Re: [ws-sx] WS-SX TC Minutes, April 4, 2007
            

          
        
        
          
            

              
              
            

          
        
        
      

    
  
  

  Hi Tony,

  

Is there any chance you can provide us some kind of report of

what tests were done and what errors were found, which was the

basis for your reporting on the failure of the first 9 examples at
today's

meeting?

  

Since the editors of the use cases doc have pretty much finished the

planned work, if we could get this information on the tests already

run, and what type of errors were found then we could determine what

corrective actions could be taken.  It would be helpful if we could

get this info while people have the details fresh at hand.

  

   Thanks,

   Rich

> 6. Other business

>

> a. Examples Document:

>

> 2.4.1 Kerberos example. Currently has no message example. No
volunteers have stepped forward to provide this and the suggestion of
the editor is to publish with section 2.4.1 as is.

>

> Rich Levinson requested that the chairs put a discussion and
possible CD vote on the agenda for 5the next meeting.

>

> Tony Nadalin noted that IBM had attempted to implement the
document and the first nine examples fail. IBM will continue to test
the updated version and file issues against examples that fail in the
latest version.

>

>

>

>