RE: [ws-sx] RE: Request to start WS-SX ballots

From
Mary McRae <>
Date
2007-04-20T17:52:13+00:00
ID
00f401c78374$a003ff50$640fa8c0@espresso
Thread
RE: [ws-sx] RE: Request to start WS-SX ballots
And just double-checking since it's not explicitly noted in 
the minutes - the TC agreed that the changes made post-review were 
non-substantive, right? 

 

Thanks again,

 

m

  

  
  From: Marc Goodner 
  [mailto:] 
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 1:34 
  PM
To: ; 'Kelvin Lawrence'; 
  
Cc: 
  
Subject: RE: [ws-sx] RE: Request to start 
  WS-SX ballots

  

  

  
Mary,

  
 

  
The 
  resolution to the issues from the second PR are in these minutes: http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-sx/200704/msg00054.html

  
 

  
The 
  application of the resolutions is documented in this message: http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-sx/200704/msg00062.html 
  

  
 

  
 

  

  

  
From: Mary McRae 
  [mailto:] On Behalf Of Mary McRae
Sent: 
  Friday, April 20, 2007 10:26 AM
To: 'Kelvin Lawrence'; 
  
Cc: 
  
Subject: [ws-sx] RE: Request to start 
  WS-SX ballots

  
 

  
Hi 
  Kelvin,

  
 

  
  
  Just a couple of things: I need an XHTML version of the specification 
  (editable source, PDF and XHTML), and also the disposition log noting the 
  resolution of comments received.

  
 

  
  
  Thanks!

  
 

  
Mary

  
    
 

    

    
    

    
From: Kelvin Lawrence 
    [mailto:] 
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 1:17 
    PM
To: Mary McRae; 
Cc: 
    
Subject: Request to start WS-SX 
    ballots

    

Mary, 
    
  
    
We’ve 
    now received four statements of use for WS-SecurityPolicy(SP). 
http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-sx/200704/msg00019.html 
    
http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-sx/200704/msg00020.html 
    
http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-sx/200704/msg00056.html 
    
http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-sx/200704/msg00057.html 
    
  
    
Can 
    you please start the following ballots to approve SP as a CS spec and 
    request to start the OS ballot as the TC agreed in the minutes 
    below[1]? 
The WS-SX TC chairs, 
    upon obtaining the required three Statements of Use, shall request the OASIS 
    TC administrator to initiate: 

    
      
a seven day WS-SX TC 
      electronic ballot to ratify the latest WS-SecurityPolicy specification 
      draft as a Committee Specification 
      
a simultaneous seven 
      day WS-SX TC electronic ballot to request an OASIS ballot to ratify 
      WS-SecurityPolicy as an OASIS standard (conditional on success of the 
      first CS approval ballot). 

    
I 
    believe this would suffice for the wording of the ballots. 
  
    
Approve 
    WS-SecurityPolicy as a Committee Specification 
Shall 
    WS-SecurityPolicy, referenced below be approved as a Committee Specification 
    set by the OASIS Web Services Secure Exchange (WS-SX) TC? 
Doc version: 
    http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-sx/download.php/23669/ws-securitypolicy-1.2-spec-cd-02-r02.doc 
    
Pdf 
    version: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-sx/download.php/23668/ws-securitypolicy-1.2-spec-cd-02-r02.pdf 
    
  
    
Submit 
    WS-SecurityPolicy for OASIS Standard Vote 
If 
    the ballot dated (today?) to move WS-SecurityPolicy to Committee 
    Specification status passes, do you further vote to send the specification 
    to OASIS for a standardization vote? 
  
    
We’ll 
    begin working on the submission package for you now. 

[1] 
    http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-sx/200704/msg00054.html 
    

Cheers
Kelvin