Next in thread →
Next in month →
Re: [ws-sx] Issue i134: InlcudeToken Policy Assertion Parametersand alternatives
As I described below, the specification contains the rationale for why these are not defined as assertions. I'm not convinced that we should change that. -----Original Message----- From: [mailto:] Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 2:26 PM To: Marc Goodner Cc: Ashok Malhotra; Aditya Athalye; Subject: Re: [ws-sx] Issue i134: InlcudeToken Policy Assertion Parameters and alternatives Hello Marc, Although what you mentioned below is a workable solution, it is preferable to depend on the Policy framework, even though it means adding a few nested assertions. IMO this is what WS Security Policy spec also recommends. Having parameters and then depending on the domain specific knowledge for doing a union of the values is less desirable than using the default intersection algorithm without extensions. Regards, Venu Marc Goodner wrote:
Next in thread →
Next in month →