RE: [ws-sx] WS-SX Errata Public Review

Thanks Marc,

 

  I’ll do my best to work my way through them – I’ll enlist
Robin’s help. I have to say that this namespace thing is getting a tad more
complicated than ever anticipated.

 

Sorry for the holdup – I’ll get the errata out either with or
without the namespace docs.

 

Mary

 

From: Marc Goodner
[mailto:] 

Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 5:55 PM

To: ; 'Kelvin Lawrence'

Cc: 

Subject: RE: [ws-sx] WS-SX Errata Public Review

 

I had indicated I didn’t know how to properly fill out the new
RDDL template in a thread predating that one. I’ve taken a stab at getting them
together. Please adjust as necessary, don’t block on me for additional editing
of these. I can help with any questions regarding any missing info. As an
example there weren’t clear place holders for all of the files produced in the
errata process (e.g. errata only vs. spec incorporating errata). Do those just
go in the PR announcement and not at the namespace?

 

From: Mary McRae
[mailto:] On Behalf Of Mary McRae

Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 1:23 PM

To: 'Kelvin Lawrence'

Cc: 

Subject: RE: [ws-sx] WS-SX Errata Public Review

 

Hi Kelvin,

 

  I was waiting on a response to my message of 12 June
 …

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-sx/email/archives/200806/msg00020.html

 

Regards,

 

Mary

 

From: Kelvin Lawrence
[mailto:] 

Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 1:10 PM

To: Mary McRae

Cc: 

Subject: [ws-sx] WS-SX Errata Public Review

 

Hi Mary. I was
asked by the TC on our call today to write to you and ask for the status of the
WSSX Errata Public Review. We initially voted to send these docs out for review
back in April and we really want to move them forward ASAP. Are you waiting on
us for anything? My understanding was that you were working on this and that we
had provided everything you needed? 

Thanks in
advance for your help in getting things moving again 

Cheers

Kelvin (WS-SX co-Chair)