RE: [ws-tx-editors] Fw: Editors instructions

From
Max Feingold <>
Date
2006-03-03T04:36:41+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [ws-tx-editors] Fw: Editors instructions
Tom:

 

I may have missed something in the on-air 
discussion, but the example given in Colleen's proposal[1] had no 'wstx' in the 
product part:

 

http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wscoor/2006/04/Register

 

To be consistent, I'd imagine WS-AT would 
just be 'wsat' and WS-BA would be 'wsba'.  I don't feel strongly about 
March vs. April, but we should be consistent across the three 
specs.

 

[1] http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-tx/200602/msg00007.html

From: Thomas Freund 
[mailto:]
Sent: Thu 3/2/2006 12:46 PM
To: 

Subject: RE: [ws-tx-editors] Fw: 
Editors instructions

Max & Andy

The only thing that passed my mind was whether the 
namespace should be:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wstx-wsba/2006/03 (if we were attempting to follow any 
sort of convention).

Regards
Tom

' 
src="gif00029.gif" width=16>"Max Feingold" 
<>

  
  

    
      
        
          
            "Max Feingold" 
              <> 
              
03/02/2006 02:19 PM

    
      
        
        

          

            
To

          
Thomas Freund/Austin/IBM@IBMUS, 
            <>

        

          

            
cc

          

        

          

            
Subject

          
RE: [ws-tx-editors] Fw: Editors 
            instructions

      
        
        

          
          

Andy:

My intention 
for WS-C was to update all references in the text, as Tom 
indicates.

From: Thomas Freund [mailto:]
Sent: Thu 3/2/2006 10:35 
AM
To: 

Subject: Re: [ws-tx-editors] Fw: 
Editors instructions

Andrew,

I had intended to do a global change (including 
the refs --- and several additional lines that seem to have been missed in the 
issue)

Tom
Andrew Wilkinson3 
<>

  
  

    
      
        
          
            
              
                
                  
                    Andrew Wilkinson3 <> 

                      
03/02/2006 11:42 AM

    
      
        
        

          
            
To

          


        

          
            
cc

          

        

          
            
Subject

          
Re: [ws-tx-editors] Fw: Editors 
        instructions

      
        
        

          
          

Max, Tom

In the interests of consistency how far do you plan 
to go with the changes 
for WS-Coor and WS-BA for issue 15?

I intend 
to update AT to describe coor with a namespace of 
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wscoor/2006/03. At the moment I don't 
intend to update the non-normative WSCOOR 
reference to refer to the new 
specification; changing the list of authors 
and publication date etc. Does 
this seem reasonable -  I don't feel 
strongly about this, just that it 
would be good for all 3 specs to be 
updated similarly.

Thanks,
Andy

Ian 
Robinson/UK/IBM@IBMGB 
02/03/2006 
16:14

To

cc

Subject
[ws-tx-editors] 
Fw: Editors instructions

One further 
thing.
As a general rule it would help the TC if each WD had 
cumulative
change-tracking since the last approved draft (CD or PR). We have 
no
approved draft yet; the base draft with respect to which changes should 
be
tracked prior to our first CDs is the first drafts that used the 
OASIS
templates. In this case, please just do your best; if you haven't 
been
tracking changes in this way so far then just start doing so from 
now.

Regards,
Ian Robinson
STSM, WebSphere Messaging and 
Transactions Architect
IBM Hursley Lab, 
UK

----- Forwarded by Ian Robinson/UK/IBM on 
02/03/2006 16:08 -----

           Ian 

           Robinson/UK/IBM 
    
                      
                      
                      To 

           02/03/2006 16:02     
     wstx-editors 
            
                      
                      
              cc 

    
                      
                      
                 Subject 

                    
                 Editors 
instructions 

Hello Editors,

Per 
the discussion on the telecon last week, please can you get updated
drafts to 
the TC by EOD Tues 7 March.

Please use the following conventions to 
ensure consistency:

On the front page of each spec, please ensure you use 
the appropriate "doc
identifier", "location" and "Technical committee" name 
and correct form of
statustext.

1. Doc identifier value (this value 
should be on the line following
"Document Identifier" and in the page 
footer)
wstx-wscoor-1.1-spec-wd-03
wstx-wsat-1.1-spec-wd-03
wstx-wsba-1.1-spec-wd-03

2. 
Location value:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wstx-wscoor-1.1-spec-wd-03.pdf
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wstx-wsat-1.1-spec-wd-03.pdf
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wstx-wsba-1.1-spec-wd-03.pdf

3. Technical committee
OASIS WS-TX TC
(Note upper case 
WS-TX)

4. Status.
The first line of the status section should 
state:
This document is published by the WS-TX TC as a ?working 
draft".

Please use a file name that is the doc identifier with a ".doc" 
file
extension e.g wstx-wsba-1.1-spec-wd-03.doc
We don't need to generate 
new PDFs yet. We will produce PDFs whenever the
TC adopts a new 
CD.

The issues that we want to incorporate in these drafts are listed 
below by
spec.

WS-Coordination

Issues: 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 13, 
15, 17, (18-21)

WS-AtomicTransaction

Issues: 15, 
17

WS-BusinessActivity

Issues: 7, 15, 
17,

Regards,
Ian