RE: [ws-tx-editors] PR drafts

Ram, you are quite right that the status
needs to be be "Public Review Draft". The WS-C draft you posted
looks good.

Regards,

Ian Robinson

Ram Jeyaraman <>

23/05/2008 02:50

To

Ian Robinson/UK/IBM@IBMGB

cc

""
<>

Subject

RE: [ws-tx-editors] PR drafts

In addition to the change
below, I have changed the URIs in the ‘This Version’ in front page to
point to the PR version of the draft. Thanks.

 

Download Document:

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-tx/download.php/28373/wstx-wscoor-1.2-spec-pr-01.doc

 

From: Ram Jeyaraman 

Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 2:40 PM

To: 'Ian Robinson'

Cc: 

Subject: RE: [ws-tx-editors] PR drafts

 

Thanks Ian,

 

Should the document status
be changed from “Working Draft” to “Public Review Draft”?

 

From: Ian Robinson [mailto:]

Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 9:18 AM

To: 

Subject: [ws-tx-editors] PR drafts

 

Editors, please produce wstx-ws**-1.2-spec-pr-01.* drafts, dated 06 May
2008 (when the TC ballot approved the CDs).

Further details regarding indicating the authoritative spec format - as
discussed on the telecon today - are in the minutes [1].

Thanks, 

Ian 

[1] http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-tx/download.php/28368/WS-TX_Minutes_2008_05_22.htm

 

Unless stated otherwise above:

IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598. 

Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU 

Unless stated otherwise above:

IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598. 

Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU

S/MIME Cryptographic Signature