RE: [ws-tx-editors] Draft CS specs

Thanks Tom.

 
>
     The previous version is cited as the errata version rather than the last
     pr version (shouldn't this be wstx-ws**-1.2-spec-pr-01 

I will change it to the PR version. 

 

 
>
     The normative reference for WS-Trust omitted the date (June 2008) 

 
>
     The non-normative references (for the WS-TX specs) should be preceded by
     OASIS Public Review Draft and should end with the date, Aug 2008

I have changed this as follows. I have added  July 2008 for SP
and SC.

 

[WSSecPolicy]    OASIS
Committee Draft 01, WS-SecurityPolicy 1.3, http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200802, July 2008.

[WSSecConv]      OASIS Committee Draft
01, WS-SecureConversation 1.4, http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-secureconversation/200512, July 2008.

[WSTrust]            OASIS Committee Draft 01, WS-Trust 1.4, http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/200802, June 2008.

1.1 Non-normative References

 

[WSAT]                OASIS Public Review Draft, Web Services
Atomic Transaction (WS-AtomicTransaction), http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wsat/2006/06.

[WSBA]                OASIS
Public Review Draft, Web Services Business Activity (WS-BusinessActivity), http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wsba/2006/06.

 

From: Thomas Freund
[mailto:] 

Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 4:58 AM

To: Ram Jeyaraman

Cc: Ian Robinson; 

Subject: RE: [ws-tx-editors] Draft CS specs

 

Ram 

A few
questions/observations ... 

 
The
     previous version is cited as the errata version rather than the last pr
     version (shouldn't this be wstx-ws**-1.2-spec-pr-01 

 
The
     normative reference for WS-Trust omitted the date (June 2008) 

 
The
     non-normative references (for the WS-TX specs) should be preceded by OASIS
     Public Review Draft and should end with the date, Aug 2008

Regards 

Tom 

 

  
  
Ram
  Jeyaraman <> 

  
08/13/2008
  08:41 PM 

  
  
  
   

    
    
To

    
    
    
Ian
    Robinson <> 

    
   

   

    
    
cc

    
    
    
""
    <> 

    
   

   

    
    
Subject

    
    
    
RE:
    [ws-tx-editors] Draft CS specs

    
   

  
  
 

  
   

    
    
   

  
  
 

Ian,

 

I
have updated the WS-Coordination specification [1]. 

 

Thanks.

 

[1]
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-tx/download.php/29037/wstx-wscoor-1.2-spec-wd-02.doc 

 

From: Ian Robinson
[mailto:] 

Sent: Monday, August 11, 2008 10:55 AM

To: 

Subject: Fw: [ws-tx-editors] Draft CS specs 

  

Editors, 

(Thanks to Mary for correcting me). 

Please could you prepare draft C, AT and BA Working Draft 02 documents
for TC approval as CDs during the next TC meeting on Aug 28. If these are
approved as CDs we will then proceed with an electronic ballot to approve
committee specifications. 

For the WD-02 drafts, please update the status to "Working Draft" .
We only need Word Doc format at present. 

The only changes needed are the formats of the references to the SX and other
TX specs. 

Any TX refs should appear like this: 

[WSCOOR]
       OASIS Public Review Draft, Web Services Coordination
(WS-Coordination) 1.2, http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wscoor/2006/06, August 2008 

Any SX references should look like this: 

[WSTrust]
                OASIS Committee Draft
01, WS-Trust 1.4, http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/200802, June 2008 

[WSSecPolicy]      
         OASIS Committee Draft 01, WS-SecurityPolicy
1.3, http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200802

[WSSecConv]
               OASIS Committee Draft
01, WS-SecureConversation 1.4, http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-secureconversation/200512

Regards,

Ian Robinson

----- Forwarded by Ian Robinson/UK/IBM on 11/08/2008 18:29 ----- 

 

  
  
"Mary
  McRae" <> 

  Sent by: Mary McRae <> 

  
25/07/2008
  13:34 

  
 

  
   

    
    
Please respond to

    <>

    
   

  
  
  
  
 

  
   

    
    
To

    
    
    
Ian
    Robinson/UK/IBM@IBMGB, <> 

    
   

   

    
    
cc

    
    
   

   

    
    
Subject

    
    
    
RE:
    [ws-tx-editors] Draft CS specs

    
   

  
  

    

  
 

  
   

    
    
   

  
  
 

Hi everyone, 

 

 Actually, if the specs to be voted on are going to be different than
those submitted for public review, the revised specs will first need to be
approved as CDs and should therefore be identified as Committee Draft 02 *once
that ballot has actually passed.* Remember, *all* works of a
technical committee are always publicly available; identifying something with a
status that the document has not yet achieved is not only against the rules,
it’s misleading. 

 

Thanks, 

 

Mary 

 

From:
Ian Robinson [mailto:] 

Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 8:22 AM

To: 

Subject: [ws-tx-editors] Draft CS specs 

 

Editors, 

Please could you prepare draft C, AT and BA specs. 

These should update the status to "Committee Specification" and be
dated when the CS approval ballot completes. That isn't scheduled yet so a
suggested date (that will have to be changed later) is Aug 28 2008. We only
need Word Doc format at present. 

The only changes needed are the formats of the references to the SX and other
TX specs. 

Any TX refs should appear like this: 

[WSCOOR]
       OASIS Public Committee Specification, Web Services
Coordination (WS-Coordination) 1.2, http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wscoor/2006/06, May 2008 

Currently, any SX references should look like this: 

[WSTrust]
                OASIS Committee Draft
01, WS-Trust 1.4, http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/200802, June 2008 

[WSSecPolicy]      
         OASIS Committee Draft 01, WS-SecurityPolicy
1.3, http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200802

[WSSecConv]
               OASIS Committee Draft
01, WS-SecureConversation 1.4, http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-secureconversation/200512

Regards,

Ian Robinson

----- Forwarded by Ian Robinson/UK/IBM on 25/07/2008 13:00 ----- 

 

  
  
Ian
  Robinson/UK/IBM
  

  
24/07/2008
  17:08 

  
  
  
  

  
 

  
   

    
    
To

    
    
    
wstx
    

    
   

   

    
    
cc

    
    
   

   

    
    
Subject

    
    
    
WS-TX
    1.2 designated cross references

    
   

  
  

  

    

  
  

  
 

  
   

    
    
   

  
  
 

As discussed on the TX call, the result of my action item to follow up with the
TC Admin on the use of the designated cross-reference change process is this:

We should modify our references to work-in-progress to identify the level of
the specification we are referring to. For example, where we currently say:

[WSTrust]
                  WS-Trust 1.4, http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/200802

[WSCOOR]
       Web Services Coordination (WS-Coordination) 1.2, http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wscoor/2006/06, OASIS, January 2008

we should instead say: 

[WSTrust]
                  OASIS Committee Draft 01, WS-Trust 1.4, http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/200802, June 2008 

[WSCOOR]
       OASIS Public Review Draft, Web Services
Coordination (WS-Coordination) 1.2, http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wscoor/2006/06, May 2008 

At Committee spec stage, our internal cross-references will be to other
committee specifications but we might still refer to WS-Trust 1.4 Public Review
Draft. We would have a ballot to approve CS drafts without any
designated cross-reference changes and to advance to OASIS Standard with designated
cross-reference changes. 

If the OS member ballot passed but the referenced spec (e.g. WS-Trust) lagged
by 4 months then during that 4 month period the published latest version of
WS-TX would be the CS but would automatically be replaced by an OS containing
the changed cross references once the referenced specs were finalized. 

Regards,

Ian Robinson 

  

  

Unless
stated otherwise above:

IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598. 

Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU

  

  

Unless
stated otherwise above:

IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598. 

Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU

 

  

Unless
stated otherwise above:

IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598. 

Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU