RE: [wsbpel-dev] RE: [wsbpel-implement] what attributes the correlation knows about incoming messages?

From
"Fckenfels. Cernd"
Date
2004-04-19T23:52:37+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [wsbpel-dev] RE: [wsbpel-implement] what attributes the correlation knows about incoming messages?
Title: what attributes the correlation knows about incoming messages?

Hello 
Kristofer,

 

a 
simple example, where the part er link is not know, is the case where you have 2 
Business Process, say "Purchasing" and "Inventory". Both have a partner 
supplier, and the engine knows about lets say 10 suppliers. The scenario featres 
an acknowledgment business message, which contains 
<ack><messagetype>ORDER</messagetype><refnum>123</refnum></ack> 
to acknowledge the receipt of an order with the number 123 and the same vor an 
inventory message. If I now receive a message from an supplier on the business 
signal port, I find 2 business process definitions receiving on that port type 
and from one of the suppliers. Therefore the correlator is the only one who can 
decide, if this was a message for the inventory or purchasing 
process.

 

 

This 
roblem is more common for reliable B2B messaging than Web services. We use our 
engine for EDI scenarios, and here it is common to have hundreds of actual 
endpoints (for example VAN mailboxes) behind the same port type, and more than 
one process definition use this port type).

Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Bernd 
Eckenfels
Chief Architect
--
SEEBURGER 
AG - Edisonstr.1 , D-75015 Bretten, Germany
Fax: +49 (0)7252 96-2400 - Phone: 
+49 (0)7252 96-1256
mailto: - http://www.seeburger.de 

  
-----Original Message-----
From: Kristofer Agren 
  [mailto:]
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 11:26 
  PM
To: Eckenfels. Bernd; 'bpel implementation'; 
  
Subject: [wsbpel-dev] RE: 
  [wsbpel-implement] what attributes the correlation knows about incoming 
  messages?

  

  
Bernd,

  
 

  
In our case, we rely 
  on knowing the partner link and operation for an incoming message, and the 
  “normal” input to the engine consists of the partner link, operation and the 
  message itself. I do not really understand why the partner link is so hard to 
  discern, since when a BPEL process is deployed, the engine knows what partner 
  links, port types and, ultimately, ports that are used to realize the 
  operations of the process. In our case, the communications binding that is 
  constructed during deployment is responsible for creating a “static” route 
  between the actual port, regardless if it is a Web Service, .NET, JMS, EJB, 
  etc. binding, and the partner link/operation.

  
 

  
Regards,

  
 

  
Kristofer

  
 

  

  

  
  

  
From: 
  Eckenfels. Bernd [mailto:] 
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 1:33 
  PM
To: bpel implementation; 
  
Subject: [wsbpel-implement] what 
  attributes the correlation knows about incoming 
  messages?

  
 

  
Hello, 
  

  
this is a question to 
  implementors, how they understood the specification: 
  

  
if I asume a SOAP Servlet, which 
  will receive HTTP Calls with SOAP (maybe a Axis Srvice or something like 
  this), it receives a SOAP Call on a specified URL (ip, port, local part) to a 
  method and with a specific message type. 

  
With those parameters, the servlet 
  can look up the operation and port type.  (since those are not part of 
  the soap call)

  
It also has some information about 
  the called (ip, basic authentication, xml security, soap headers) and may be 
  able to lookup a implementation specific trading partner. 
  

  
But, it has a hard time to 
  actually know about a partner link. In fact due to correlations it may not 
  even try to find out the partner link.

  
So I asume, that the normal 
  "input" to the correlation engine of a BPEL engine is the representation of 
  the call, the portType/operation, but not the partner link. This also means, 
  that the correlation must be able to find the input message across multiple 
  receives from different or the same process definitions (i.e. with different 
  partner links).

  
I 
  also guess, that most engines will support some policies for actually 
  restricting incoming messages to a subset of the receive activities, but thtat 
  does not affect the basic asumption, that the implementaiotn of a bpel engine 
  has to deal with events to a specified porttype/operation with unspecified 
  partner link.

  
Especially since in the incoming 
  case late binding is as common as in the outgoing case (partners and partner 
  links in process definitions are very often only "roles" in B2B 
  scenarios).

  
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Bernd 
  Eckenfels
Chief 
  Architect
--
SEEBURGER AG - Edisonstr.1 , D-75015 Bretten, Germany
Fax: +49 (0)7252 96-2400 
  - Phone: +49 (0)7252 96-1256
mailto: - 
  http://www.seeburger.de 
  

  
  Yahoo! Groups Links

  
    
To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wsbpel-dev/
  

    
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

  

    
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.