Re: [wsbpel-spec-edit] Issues call June 2

Hi Alex,

Actually 75 shows up as in 3 categories
- compensation, partner links and state management.  1 is in compensation
and 10 is in state management.   I called out 1 and 10 in the hopes
that there would be some new progress on them.  We may want to add
a review of the other partner links and state management issues to the
list too.    I'm thinking that since the intent of the categorization
is to make sure that possible relationships between issues are considered,
 its better to illuminate the possibilities - if there isn't a relationship
between two specific issues, that's ok, we'll just move on.    

Regards, Diane

IBM  Dynamic e-business Technologies



(919)254-7221 or 8-444-7221, Mobile: 919-624-5123

Alex Yiu <>

06/04/2004 05:10 PM

To

Diane Jordan/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS

cc

bpel rqmts <>,
bpel spec <>, Alex Yiu <>

Subject

Re: [wsbpel-spec-edit] Issues
call June 2

Hi Diane

Just a clarification: issue 75 is about locally scoped partner link. 

I guess it is not  necessarily related to compensation. 

We may have two items: one for Issue 75, one for compensation (Issue 1
and 10).

Hope that make sense. 

Regards,

Alex

Diane Jordan wrote:

We didn't have an issues call this week.  I just sent the agenda for
next week's tc call with the outstanding issues for discussion/voting.
 I would like to have a proposal for the f2f agenda out to the tc
for review before Wed.    Here is my initial thinking:

- issue 107 and other issues related to abstract processes.   

- issue 103 and other data handling related issues.  

- issue 75 and other compensation related issues.  This includes issue
10.  Since issue 1 is related to 10, include that and scopes.  

- issue 37 and other correlation issues.  (if issue 37 closes next
week, we'll find another topic). 

- any other issues people want to get discussion started on

I'd appreciate any ideas you have. 

Regards, Diane

IBM  Dynamic e-business Technologies



(919)254-7221 or 8-444-7221, Mobile: 919-624-5123

----- Forwarded by Diane Jordan/Raleigh/IBM on 06/04/2004 04:50 PM -----

Diane Jordan/Raleigh/IBM

06/02/2004 03:45 PM

To

bpel rqmts <>

cc

bpel spec <>

Subject

Input for call today

Hi, 

My schedule has gone haywire today - I will call in, but will be in transit
to another building and have a hard stop at 4:30, so our discussion won't
be all I hoped it could be.  I've also heard that Yaron and Monica
may not be available.  So, here are some thoughts we could have discussed
- lets get some reactions going by email.   

Here is what I think we have currently in the wings for next week's call:

- vote on 37 (no input that I'm aware of from those who volunteered to
provide further analysis and a possible alternative).   

- vote on issue 34/proposal to defer 

- defer vote on 107 pending progress in the group working on abstract processes.
 Will ask Phil for a report.   

- proposal on 103:  Alex and Yaron are still working on this - they
seemed to think its unlikely to have a resolution by next week, but we
should check with them.   

 - issue 75 proposal 

- issue 83 

I took advantage of the spec editing call today to solicit ideas for the
f2f agenda.  Here is what we came up with (largely driven by issues
in the list above that we don't expect to close next week - if we do, we'll
need another strategy):   

- issue 107 and other issues related to abstract processes.  Hopefully
there will be some results from Phil's subgroup to review.

- issue 103 and other data handling related issues.  Alex's view was
that we could use the f2f to discuss 103 which should make it possible
to propose a resolution for the next call. 

- issue 75 and other compensation related issues, including issue 10 which
Satish continues to work.  (Since Satish is working on issue 10, we'll
keep this onthe agenda even if 75 closes next week).  Since issue
1 is related to 10, we'll also include that and scopes.  

- issue 37 and other correlation issues.  (Again, if issue 37 closes
next week, we'll find another topic). 

- any other issues people want to get discussion started on

Before next week I will send a list of those ideas folks have generated
for managing votes if we don't have quorum at the f2f - we can discuss
them on the TC call and decide if any thing different should be adopted.
 I'll send a preliminary list to you all and finalize before the TC
call on Wed.   

Regards, Diane

IBM  Dynamic e-business Technologies



(919)254-7221 or 8-444-7221, Mobile: 919-624-5123