Yes, I intentionally did not allow ourselves 999 updates -- a bad omen for how long this would take I thought ;-)
________________________________
From: Ben Bloch [mailto:]
Sent: Wed 3/24/2004 5:20 AM
To: 'Prasad Yendluri'; Satish Thatte;
Cc: 'Alex Yiu'
Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] Agenda: take stock
I am not sure if I can be on call today (currently I have a conflict) but I have 1.021 (or is it 1.21) - I grabbed it on 3/15. Not sure if this is the latest or not - according to the log in the document, checked in by you on the 14th.
I can send it out or try to check it if needed. Just let me know.
Also, I have a question about version numbers. Versions in CVS log are not in synch with those in doc itself. CVS versions go from 1.1-1.19 while versions in doc go from 1.01-1.019 (actually 1.021 but one more digit to the right). Is this intentional? Which is the "real" version number? Kind of confusing to me anyway.
Ben
________________________________
From: Prasad Yendluri [mailto:]
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 4:33 AM
To: Satish Thatte;
Cc: Alex Yiu
Subject: Re: [wsbpel-spec-edit] Agenda: take stock
Hi,
CVS seems to have lost both of our (mine and Kevin's) updates that were made on 3/14 (rev1.20) and 3/16 (1.21) resp'ly. I have a local copy of 1.20 (I think 1.21 also), so we can try and check-in again. I guess we also need to make sure the CVS system is back to normal.
Regards, Prasad
------- Original Message --------
Subject:
[wsbpel-spec-edit] Agenda: take stock
Date:
Tue, 23 Mar 2004 20:59:59 -0800
From:
Satish Thatte <> <mailto:>
To:
Alex Yiu <> <mailto:> , <> <mailto:>
I am confused. Rev 1.19 was the one I checked in on March 10.
Kevin is supposed to have checked in after me. I also thought
Prasad had updated for 80 and 95. None of those changes are
sowing up on CVS. I am also seeing 1.19 as the latest.
Let us take stock tomorrow and try to recover to the point we should be at.
Satish
