Speaking for 115, my answer is yes. I
will get the proposal out.
From: Diane Jordan
[mailto:]
Sent: Friday, June 04, 2004 2:03 PM
To: Yaron Y. Goland; Satish Thatte
Cc: bpel spec
Subject: issue list clean up -
issue 84
As promised/threatened many times, I'm going through
the issue list to see if there are some candidates for action based on the
original text.
issue
84: Submitter's proposal: The BPEL spec be required to explicit define all
static analysis checks that BPEL's semantics depend on in the text of the
standard. Add an appendix, much like the existing fault summary appendix, that
will provide a single checklist of all static analysis requirements with a
brief description of their function.
Issue
115: Submitter's proposal: Rewrite appendix C to preserve the relevant
content without external dependencies.
Are
these ones where we could ask the TC to vote on the general concept and then
ask the spec editing team to come up with the actual text required?
If
so, perhaps you could get proposals to vote out?
Thanks.
Regards,
Diane
IBM Dynamic e-business
Technologies
(919)254-7221 or 8-444-7221, Mobile:
919-624-5123
