RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] mistakes in XSD in transitionCondition and joinCondition syntax description

This is not a spec bug in the sense of "clarify uniqueness of activity naming".  It is a bunch of clerical mistakes.  We should just fix them.

________________________________

From: Alex Yiu [mailto:]
Sent: Thu 9/16/2004 4:18 PM
To: bpel spec
Cc: Alex Yiu
Subject: [wsbpel-spec-edit] mistakes in XSD in transitionCondition and joinCondition syntax description



Hi, all editors,

When Yaron and I were cooking the formal proposal for Issue 103, we found a syntax mistake about joinCondition in Section 6.2: 

========================
<targets>?            
   <target linkName="ncname">+
      <joinCondition expressionLanguage="anyURI"?>?
        ... bool-expr ... 
      </joinCondition>
   </target>
</targets>
<sources>?
   <source linkName="ncname">+
      <transitionCondition expressionLanguage="anyURI"?>?
        ... bool-expr ... 
      </transitionCondition>
   </source>
</sources>
========================

It is not in sync with the rest of the spec. 

I guess it should become: 
========================
<targets>?            
   <joinCondition expressionLanguage="anyURI"?>?
        ... bool-expr ... 
   </joinCondition>
   <target linkName="ncname"/>+
</targets>
<sources>?
   <source linkName="ncname">+
      <transitionCondition expressionLanguage="anyURI"?>?
        ... bool-expr ... 
      </transitionCondition>
   </source>
</sources>
========================

Also, in the XSD, I believe the "minOccurs" is missing in XSD for joinCondition and transitionCondition:
========================
    <complexType name="tTargets">
        <complexContent>
            <extension base="bpws:tExtensibleElements">
                <sequence>
                    <element name="joinCondition" type="bpws:tCondition" minOccurs="0"/>
                    <element name="target" type="bpws:tTarget" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
                </sequence>
            </extension>
        </complexContent>
    </complexType>
========================
========================
    <complexType name="tSource">
        <complexContent>
            <extension base="bpws:tExtensibleElements">
                <sequence>
                    <element name="transitionCondition" type="bpws:tCondition" minOccurs="0"/>
                </sequence>
                <attribute name="linkName" type="NCName" use="required"/>
            </extension>
        </complexContent>
========================


Is this change big enough to file a bug issue ?


Thanks!


Regards,
Alex Yiu