Fw: [wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed

Sorry I missed the call today - from
the email it seems the problems with sourceforge have been overcome - let
me know if otherwise. 

Regards, Diane

IBM  Emerging Internet Software Standards



(919)254-7221 or 8-444-7221, Mobile: 919-624-5123, Fax 845-491-5709

----- Forwarded by Diane
Jordan/Raleigh/IBM on 04/26/2005 02:57 PM -----

"Satish Thatte"
<> 

04/26/2005 12:50 PM

To

Francisco Curbera/Watson/IBM@IBMUS

cc

"Alex Yiu" <>,
"Alex Yiu" <>,
<>

Subject

RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] updated
spec committed

Yep you did - Alex is going to finish redoing the
edits that were lost

in the migration to SF and then pass then pen to Assaf.  That's all.

-----Original Message-----

From: Francisco Curbera [mailto:] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 9:44 AM

To: Satish Thatte

Cc: Alex Yiu; Alex Yiu; 

Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed

Did I just miss the (very short) call? I somehow used the wrong PC and

called 10 mins late...

Paco

 

                    
 "Satish Thatte"

                    
 <satisht@microsof        To:    
  "Alex Yiu"

<>, Francisco Curbera/Watson/IBM@IBMUS  
       

                    
 t.com>                
  cc:       "Alex Yiu"

<>,          
                     
   

 

<>

                    
 04/26/2005 01:01         Subject:  RE:

[wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed

                    
 AM

 

thanks.  should be a short call tomorrow.  i need to leave by
10 am

anyway

:-)

________________________________

From: Alex Yiu [mailto:]

Sent: Mon 4/25/2005 12:42 PM

To: Francisco Curbera

Cc: Alex Yiu; 

Subject: Re: [wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed

Paco, thanks!

And, I will first re-apply the changes lost in the CVS migration

(related to what Danny raised in Issue 205).

Regards,

Alex Yiu

Francisco Curbera wrote:

>I committed the spec and main schema with the changes for issue 112.
In

the

>amended resolution there was no reference to the <reply> activity

(which

>should also be covered by this resolution) so I added that (in the
BNF

>syntax in section 6.2 and 11.4, and in the text in 11.4). I also

updated

>the schema accordingly.

>

>The pen goes to Alex.

>

>Paco

>

>

>

>

>                    
 Alex Yiu

>                    
 <alex.yiu@oracle.        To:    
  Francisco

Curbera/Watson/IBM@IBMUS

>                    
 com>                  
  cc:       Satish Thatte

<>, Assaf Arkin <>,

>                    
                     
     "Furniss, Peter"

<>, bpel spec

>                    
 04/14/2005 05:47

<>, , Alex Yiu

>                    
 PM                  
     <>

>                    
                     
    Subject:  Re:

[wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed

>

>

>

>

>

>

>Hi Paco,

>

>I do not need to get the pen now, if you want to finish 112.

>Now I assume the pen is in Paco's hand for now until he finishes 112.

>

>Thanks!

>

>

>Regards,

>Alex Yiu

>

>

>Francisco Curbera wrote:

>      I think I had the pen to apply 112, once I clarify
the details

with

>      Yaron,

>      which I will try to do right now.

>

>      Paco

>

>

>

>

>                    
       "Satish Thatte"

>

>                    
       <satisht@microsof        To:

"Furniss,

>      Peter" <>,
Francisco

>                    
       t.com>

>      Curbera/Watson/IBM@IBMUS, "bpel spec"

>      <>,
"Alex

>                    
                     
           Yiu"

>      <>

>

>                    
       04/14/2005 12:27        
cc:

>      <>, "Assaf Arkin"
<>

>

>                    
       PM            
          Subject:  RE:

>      [wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed

>

>

>

>

>

>

>      Thanks Peter.  Alex, I believe you have the
pen to finish 111.1

as

>      well as

>      102 and 103.

>

>      ________________________________

>

>      From: Furniss, Peter [mailto:]

>      Sent: Thu 4/14/2005 9:04 AM

>      To: Satish Thatte; Francisco Curbera; bpel spec

>      Cc: ; Assaf Arkin

>      Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed

>

>

>

>      Editors,

>

>      I've just updated the "Resolved issues awaiting
editing" table -

I've

>      left 111.1 as awaiting, since the schema isn't
done yet, but

marked

>      93

>      as done.

>

>      Peter

>

>

>            -----Original Message-----

>            From: Satish Thatte [mailto:]

>            Sent: 12 April 2005 18:21

>            To: Francisco Curbera; bpel
spec

>            Cc: ; Assaf
Arkin

>            Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit]
updated spec committed

>

>

>            Dear Editors,

>

>            After Paco is done, I suggest
the following assignments

>

>            Alex:  102, 103, 111.1
(XSD)

>

>            Assaf: 29, 81, 160

>

>            Satish: 86, 130, 139, 186

>

>            Yaron: 132, 136, 154

>

>            Passing the pen in that order.
 I believe Alex and Assaf

are

>            up and running with SourceForge.
 Alex needs to finish the

>            XSD work on 111.1 which Paco
has completed in the text.

>            Yaron and I are not yet up
with SourceForge, so this lets

us

>            procrastinate a bit more.
 Putting Yaron last to give him

>            time to hit us with the 22
additional issues he is working

on

>            :-)

>

>            Let me know if this is acceptable.

>

>            We still have 126, 140 and
163 open for other editors to

>            volunteer for.

>

>            Satish

>

>             -----Original Message-----

>            From: Satish Thatte

>            Sent: Tuesday, April 12,
2005 10:09 AM

>            To: 'Francisco Curbera';
bpel spec

>            Cc: ''

>            Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit]
updated spec committed

>

>            Yaron and Paco need to sync
up and tell us the status of 93

>            and 112. Paco still has the
pen.  More mail on issues will

>            follow.

>

>            -----Original Message-----

>            From: Francisco Curbera [mailto:]

>            Sent: Saturday, April 02,
2005 10:10 PM

>            To: bpel spec

>            Subject: [wsbpel-spec-edit]
updated spec committed

>

>            I took the job of applying
the following issue resolutions:

>            12.1, 93, 111.1 and 112.

>

>            - 12.1 had already been applied
(in fact I had already done

>            so a month ago

>            - we need to update the "Resolved
issues awaiting editing

>            into spec" table).

>

>            - 93 has been applied to
the spec AND the wsbpel_main.xsd

>            schema. Note that the last
text change for section 13.4 was

>            defined in the resolution
terms of the pre-12.1 text; the

>            post-12.1 text already incorporates
an equivalent change -

>            Yaron, can you please check?

>

>            - 111.1 has been applied
to the spec, but I agreed to work

>            with Alex on the schema;
I believe Alex will be taking a

>            first pass at updating wsbpel_main.xsd
once he get the pen.

>

>            - 112 - I am a bit unsure
about what is the final

resolution

>            for this one; Yaron's resolution
was amended (by me and

>            Danny) to use the form

>

>            <toPart part="ncname"
fromVariable="ncname"/>

>

>            and to not require a precise
ordering of parts; I am not

sure

>            if this amendments apply
as well to the <fromPart...> spec,

>            or the <fromPart...>
spec was left as in the original

>            proposal. The minutes do
not seem to say anything so I

would

>            appreciate everyone's help
in reconstructing what exactly

was

>            decided (Yaron as the sponsor
of the resolution probably

>            remembers better than me)
- then I will dutifully apply it

to

>            the spec.

>

>            So I am keeping the pen for
now, pending some clarification

on

>            112.

>

>            Thanks,

>

>            Paco

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>