Re: [wsbpel-spec-edit] XSD details of <extensibleAssign>

Hi Alex,

I assume you are talking about the XSD for issue 111, maybe I am wrong. If
so, shouldn't we wait to see how the issue is closed? AFAIK there are two
proposals on hte table.

Paco



                                                                                                                                        
                      Alex Yiu                                                                                                          
                      <alex.yiu@oracle.        To:       bpel spec <>                              
                      com>                     cc:       Francisco Curbera/Watson/IBM@IBMUS, Alex Yiu <>, Yaron      
                                                Goland <>, Satish Thatte <>                         
                      05/25/2005 11:47         Subject:  [wsbpel-spec-edit] XSD details of <extensibleAssign>                           
                      PM                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                        





Hi all,

As the dusts around extension syntax got settled, I guess it's time to
proceed with some XSD details for <extensibleAssign>.

I believe the XSD of <extensibleAssign> can be as straight forward as that.

<element name="extensibleAssign" type="bpws:tExtensibleElements" />

And, it supports these two variants of syntax.

<extensibleAssign>
    <foo:update> .... </foo:update>
</extensibleAssign>

<extensibleAssign foo:emptyVariable="myVar" />

Does it sound good to everybody?
If so, I will forward this email from the editor list to the main TC list.

Do you guys think that we need to have a simple voting to confirm this
XSD details? Or, leave as editorial changes?


Thanks!



Regards,
Alex Yiu